4.6 sec in total
8 ms
4.5 sec
170 ms
Visit workflow.cioreview.com now to see the best up-to-date Workflow CIOReview content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about workflow.cioreview.com
CIOReview is a leading print and digital magazine that bridges the gap between enterprise technology vendors & buyers. As a knowledge network, CIOReview offers a range of in-depth CIO/CXO articles, wh...
Visit workflow.cioreview.comWe analyzed Workflow.cioreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 8 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
workflow.cioreview.com performance score
8 ms
2227 ms
193 ms
277 ms
16 ms
Our browser made a total of 142 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 13% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Workflow.cioreview.com, 44% (62 requests) were made to Cioreview.com and 13% (18 requests) were made to Magazine.cioreview.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Workflow.cioreview.com.
Page size can be reduced by 756.3 kB (30%)
2.5 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Workflow.cioreview.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 233.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 114.6 kB, which is 43% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 233.8 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 64.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Workflow CIOReview images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 295.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 295.6 kB or 35% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 162.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Workflow.cioreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 162.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 65 (50%)
129
64
The browser has sent 129 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Workflow CIOReview. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 44 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
workflow.cioreview.com
8 ms
workflow.cioreview.com
2227 ms
gpt.js
193 ms
js
277 ms
atrk.js
16 ms
jquery.min.js
164 ms
javascript_version1.js
148 ms
javascript_version2_ads.js
159 ms
searchtracker.js
13 ms
outer_cio.css
78 ms
font-awesome.min.css
184 ms
ionicons.min.css
180 ms
master.css
93 ms
qaforff_new.css
119 ms
all_in_one.css
188 ms
ddm8_v10_new.css
182 ms
css
186 ms
element.js
255 ms
header_part_css_new.css
157 ms
styles.css
181 ms
font-awesome.min.css
525 ms
font-awesome.min.css
209 ms
jquery.sidr.dark.css
156 ms
search.js
523 ms
functions.min.js
185 ms
jquery.min.js
207 ms
flexslider.css
114 ms
css
89 ms
bootstrap.min.css
261 ms
jquery.min.js
262 ms
bootstrap.min.js
267 ms
jquery-1.10.2.js
260 ms
right_part_new.css
150 ms
css
259 ms
bjqs-1.3.min.js
151 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
126 ms
widgets.js
180 ms
js&f=jquery.js,easing.min.js,1.8.2.min.js,carouFredSel.js,superfish.js,customM.js,flexslider-min.js,jtwt.min.js,jflickrfeed.min.js
179 ms
ui_new.js
199 ms
carouFredSel_new.js
198 ms
superfish_new.js
197 ms
customM_new.js
197 ms
flexslider-min_new.js
198 ms
jtwt.min_new.js
202 ms
jflickrfeed.min.js
202 ms
mobilemenu.js
202 ms
mypassion3.js
244 ms
ddmjs3_new.js
244 ms
ddmjs4_new.js
244 ms
slider-menu.js
256 ms
jquery.easy-ticker.js
148 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
257 ms
jquery_cookie.js
179 ms
custom.js
195 ms
styles.css
47 ms
gpt.js
351 ms
savetracknew.php
637 ms
gtm.js
170 ms
analytics.js
148 ms
line.png
70 ms
Untitled_twitter.png
69 ms
li1side.png
69 ms
fb32.gif
69 ms
cr-logo.png
69 ms
Banner-CIOReview%20-%20Wireless.jpg
70 ms
705x485_q4Pvf60T.jpg
68 ms
705x485_WT16.jpg
72 ms
705x485_eUrm72yN.jpg
74 ms
705x485_g9wdz7bR.jpg
73 ms
705x485_Mt1o.jpg
71 ms
101x69_lSYMQIk2.png
72 ms
101x69_ZAa9okQ4.jpg
73 ms
101x69_YIRM09Zu.jpg
116 ms
101x69_osxU194f.jpg
118 ms
101x69_xTCwWRJo.jpg
117 ms
705x485_s8B6K7GY.jpg
116 ms
280x192_6k8rUXCf.jpg
117 ms
280x192_W9L3Ttf5.jpg
116 ms
280x192_31w0Zi6c.jpg
143 ms
280x192_42do.jpg
144 ms
280x192_wxTSV54b.jpg
143 ms
280x192_w03XZSy1.gif
143 ms
705x485_OJ6l0L53.jpg
143 ms
705x485_23dvzXA8.jpg
144 ms
280x192_LrVE2i0A.jpg
149 ms
280x192_mcvBTC4t.jpg
145 ms
280x192_51WC.jpg
147 ms
280x192_SQH5.jpg
145 ms
280x192_34i8sn0M.jpg
146 ms
280x192_Q6rb.jpg
147 ms
280x192_KJy0l69t.jpg
148 ms
jru5e.300350.jpg
152 ms
xwn7.Magzter_Workflow-2023---CIOReview-1.jpg
150 ms
wrf.workflow.jpg
151 ms
wesjx.imag300x350workflow.jpg
148 ms
vft5o.workflowmag.jpg
145 ms
pubads_impl.js
96 ms
css
61 ms
nwo8z.workflow.jpg
89 ms
02fkq.workflow.jpg
88 ms
dseco.workflow.jpg
94 ms
280x192_8M4t371a.jpg
89 ms
280x192_dm5e3Twc.jpg
89 ms
280x192_4G9kM261.jpg
87 ms
280x192_XDOJT6Hf.jpg
88 ms
280x192_JTNvLDbF.jpg
86 ms
280x192_d8EMp3g0.jpg
87 ms
280x192_FRPf2e3z.jpg
86 ms
280x192_84EDBnL5.jpg
88 ms
280x192_1U7W.jpg
51 ms
705x485_SQH5.jpg
48 ms
705x485_KJy0l69t.jpg
48 ms
0lnk2.jpg
47 ms
x.png
45 ms
js
182 ms
res-menu-icon.jpg
159 ms
ads
233 ms
container.html
112 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
89 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
94 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
90 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
85 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
88 ms
1000.css
53 ms
fontawesome-webfont.ttf
138 ms
767.css
50 ms
slider-nav.png
87 ms
15837343187111854526
236 ms
abg_lite.js
236 ms
window_focus.js
236 ms
ufs_web_display.js
79 ms
icon.png
23 ms
479.css
52 ms
1280.css
17 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
106 ms
all.js
160 ms
8145981230328317596
58 ms
icon.png
57 ms
all.js
10 ms
pixel.png
247 ms
core.js
244 ms
widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html
120 ms
workflow.cioreview.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Workflow.cioreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Workflow.cioreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
workflow.cioreview.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Workflow CIOReview. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: