Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

writingtrack.com.cutestat.com

Writingtrack : Welcome To The Act of Creating Written Works | Writing Track

Page Load Speed

10 sec in total

First Response

621 ms

Resources Loaded

7.2 sec

Page Rendered

2.3 sec

writingtrack.com.cutestat.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to writingtrack.com.cutestat.com homepage info - get ready to check Writingtrack Com Cutestat best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about writingtrack.com.cutestat.com

While seeking for the creative written works that should be one of its kinds and meet the global norms at the same time, try the Writing Track services.

Visit writingtrack.com.cutestat.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Writingtrack.com.cutestat.com page load time and found that the first response time was 621 ms and then it took 9.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

writingtrack.com.cutestat.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

writingtrack.com.cutestat.com

621 ms

bootstrap.min.css

157 ms

style_frontend.css

171 ms

bootstrap.min.js

170 ms

js

164 ms

Our browser made a total of 152 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Writingtrack.com.cutestat.com, 18% (27 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 13% (20 requests) were made to Cdn.cutestat.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) relates to the external source Lg3.media.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 218.0 kB (20%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

846.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Writingtrack.com.cutestat.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 556.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 194.3 kB

  • Original 234.3 kB
  • After minification 234.0 kB
  • After compression 39.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 194.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 9.6 kB

  • Original 556.7 kB
  • After minification 547.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Writingtrack Com Cutestat images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 12.1 kB

  • Original 267.8 kB
  • After minification 267.7 kB
  • After compression 255.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 1.9 kB

  • Original 5.4 kB
  • After minification 5.4 kB
  • After compression 3.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Writingtrack.com.cutestat.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.9 kB or 35% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 78 (60%)

Requests Now

131

After Optimization

53

The browser has sent 131 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Writingtrack Com Cutestat. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 46 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

writingtrack.com.cutestat.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Writingtrack.com.cutestat.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Writingtrack.com.cutestat.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Writingtrack Com Cutestat. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: