4.2 sec in total
435 ms
1.4 sec
2.5 sec
Visit blog.designbook.com now to see the best up-to-date Blog Designbook content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about blog.designbook.com
www.designbook.com
Visit blog.designbook.comWe analyzed Blog.designbook.com page load time and found that the first response time was 435 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
blog.designbook.com performance score
435 ms
12 ms
9 ms
9 ms
16 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Blog.designbook.com, 17% (12 requests) were made to 40.media.tumblr.com and 14% (10 requests) were made to 41.media.tumblr.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (865 ms) relates to the external source 40.media.tumblr.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (28%)
4.4 MB
3.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Blog.designbook.com main page is 4.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 119.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 28.8 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 119.0 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 169.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Blog Designbook images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 808.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 808.7 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 126.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Blog.designbook.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 126.9 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (33%)
67
45
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Blog Designbook. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
blog.designbook.com
435 ms
pre_tumblelog.js
12 ms
font-awesome.min.css
9 ms
main2.0.min.css
9 ms
tumblelog_post_message_queue.js
16 ms
jquery.min.js
65 ms
photosetgrid1.0.1.js
48 ms
app.min.js
48 ms
index.js
48 ms
tumblr_inline_o2plgvRLQo1t40fpi_500.jpg
762 ms
tumblr_inline_o2peqlO6bP1t40fpi_500.jpg
46 ms
like_iframe.html
41 ms
tumblr_inline_o2ark6BdAl1t40fpi_540.jpg
319 ms
143370881
313 ms
136515224
264 ms
tumblr_inline_o2aquoAFwq1t40fpi_540.jpg
397 ms
tumblr_inline_o1czixUOXr1t40fpi_500.png
698 ms
tumblr_inline_o1czjcbZtI1t40fpi_500.png
579 ms
tumblr_inline_o1czjrEqMv1t40fpi_500.png
580 ms
tumblr_inline_o164ah8zGk1t40fpi_500.jpg
535 ms
tumblr_inline_o16420xRat1t40fpi_500.jpg
445 ms
tumblr_inline_o16467qE2e1t40fpi_500.png
579 ms
tumblr_inline_nu04da9PUd1t40fpi_540.png
865 ms
tumblr_inline_nsbhga1aTy1t40fpi_500.jpg
614 ms
tumblr_inline_nr6azgeguu1t40fpi_500.png
636 ms
tumblr_inline_nqrjgm0NtC1t40fpi_500.jpg
636 ms
tumblr_inline_o2pg4aexJh1t40fpi_500.jpg
300 ms
tumblr_inline_o2pfwnaG9R1t40fpi_500.jpg
247 ms
tumblr_inline_o2arhyheZ81t40fpi_540.jpg
819 ms
tumblr_static_2emszgbz80bosc4oksgo84ogs_2048_v2.jpg
297 ms
tumblr_inline_o2pfqdFGYA1t40fpi_500.jpg
133 ms
tumblr_inline_o2are622pv1t40fpi_540.png
136 ms
tumblr_inline_o2arnqXpD81t40fpi_540.jpg
130 ms
tumblr_inline_nu0d8fy5IF1t40fpi_500.png
136 ms
tumblr_inline_nsbhf1NNQm1t40fpi_500.jpg
132 ms
tumblr_inline_nsbhmi0uSP1t40fpi_500.jpg
130 ms
tumblr_inline_nr6aw0KHbg1t40fpi_500.png
134 ms
tumblr_inline_nqrji7xxuy1t40fpi_500.jpg
241 ms
tumblr_inline_nqrjme6GFs1t40fpi_500.jpg
132 ms
analytics.js
102 ms
impixu
294 ms
impixu
208 ms
analytics.html
205 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
118 ms
login_check.html
45 ms
collect
95 ms
avatar_586a7ac74849_40.png
133 ms
iframe_logo.png
110 ms
collect
196 ms
player.js
190 ms
player.css
146 ms
ga.js
110 ms
vuid.min.js
189 ms
rapid-3.36.js
77 ms
rapidworker-1.2.js
89 ms
__utm.gif
63 ms
__utm.gif
55 ms
analytics.js
126 ms
cs.js
166 ms
addthis.html
160 ms
ga-audiences
155 ms
__utm.gif
92 ms
proxy.html
86 ms
540937998.jpg
138 ms
8761414_60x60.jpg
82 ms
531047178.jpg
83 ms
addthis_widget.js
39 ms
api.html
43 ms
300lo.json
63 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
41 ms
cedexis.radar.js
6 ms
blog.designbook.com SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Blog.designbook.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Blog.designbook.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
blog.designbook.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Blog Designbook. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: