Tools & Wizards About Us
daisyowl.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 89

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    90% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 84% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

daisyowl.com

Daisy Owl

Page Load Speed

993 ms in total

First Response

219 ms

Resources Loaded

568 ms

Page Rendered

206 ms

daisyowl.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Daisy Owl content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about daisyowl.com

Daisy Owl Front Page

Visit daisyowl.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Daisyowl.com page load time and found that the first response time was 219 ms and then it took 774 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

daisyowl.com performance score

89

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

91/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

85/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.7 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value260 ms

83/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.057

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.5 s

92/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

daisyowl.com

219 ms

css.css

72 ms

bgbanner.gif

155 ms

206.gif

348 ms

ga.js

28 ms

Our browser made a total of 6 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Daisyowl.com, 33% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (348 ms) belongs to the original domain Daisyowl.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 4.2 kB (18%)

Content Size

23.8 kB

After Optimization

19.6 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Daisyowl.com main page is 23.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 17.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 4.3 kB
  • After minification 4.2 kB
  • After compression 1.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 2.7 kB or 63% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 34 B

  • Original 17.2 kB
  • After minification 17.2 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 2.4 kB
  • After minification 2.2 kB
  • After compression 880 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Daisyowl.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.5 kB or 63% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

5

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 5 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Daisy Owl. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

daisyowl.com

daisyowl.com

219 ms

css.css

css.css

72 ms

bgbanner.gif

bgbanner.gif

155 ms

206.gif

206.gif

348 ms

ga.js

ga.js

28 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

11 ms

Accessibility Review

daisyowl.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

daisyowl.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

daisyowl.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Daisyowl.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Daisyowl.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

daisyowl.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Daisy Owl. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: