Report Summary

  • 92

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    92% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

204 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

442 ms

daisyum.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Daisyum content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about daisyum.com

A passionate food blogger with reviews and recommendations to restaurants and cafes in Adelaide.

Visit daisyum.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Daisyum.com page load time and found that the first response time was 204 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

daisyum.com performance score

92

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

74/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

81/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.3 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value80 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.4 s

93/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

daisyum.com

204 ms

ZphB-IK5w_lonalPBOZSC-Zng0rOWTr_UTToQU8spbtfeCqffFHN4UJLFRbh52jhWD9UFebuZe4RZQsKw2buZeJoF2IXwDg8wyTdZeBTSa8udPoRdhXCiaiaOcsy-WFoiAX0jhNlOeUzjhBC-eNDifUqjA8DpPuCjAq0SaBujW48Sagyjh90jhNlOfG0ZeBTSaqldeBTO1FUiABkZWF3jAF8OcFzdPJwSY4zpe8ljPu0daZyH6qJ73IbMg6gJMJ7fbKCMsMMeMC6MKG4f5J7IMMjMkMfH6qJtkGbMg6FJMJ7fbKzMsMMeMb6MKG4fOMgIMMj2KMfH6GJCwbgIMMjgPMfH6GJCSbgIMMj2kMfH6qJnbIbMg6eJMJ7fbK0MsMMegM6MKG4fJCgIMMjgkMfH6qJRMIbMg6sJMJ7fbKTMsMMeM66MKG4fHGgIMMjIKMfH6qJKbIbMg64JMJ7fbKHMsMMegw6MTMg0vQ3l69.js

118 ms

css

32 ms

site.js

43 ms

show_ads.js

18 ms

Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Daisyum.com, 27% (22 requests) were made to Static1.squarespace.com and 22% (18 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (557 ms) relates to the external source Static1.squarespace.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 132.9 kB (14%)

Content Size

933.9 kB

After Optimization

801.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Daisyum.com main page is 933.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 730.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 104.5 kB

  • Original 126.0 kB
  • After minification 113.4 kB
  • After compression 21.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 104.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 28.0 kB

  • Original 730.6 kB
  • After minification 702.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Daisyum images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 389 B

  • Original 77.3 kB
  • After minification 77.1 kB
  • After compression 76.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (31%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

41

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Daisyum. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

daisyum.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

daisyum.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

daisyum.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Daisyum.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Daisyum.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Daisyum. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: