Tools & Wizards About Us
danielhuff.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 56

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 24% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

danielhuff.com

James Rose Properties

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

153 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

220 ms

danielhuff.com screenshot

About Website

Visit danielhuff.com now to see the best up-to-date Danielhuff content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about danielhuff.com

Daniel Huff is a loacl real estate investor helping homeowners get rid of burdensome houses fast.

Visit danielhuff.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Danielhuff.com page load time and found that the first response time was 153 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

danielhuff.com performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

22/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.0 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.7 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value310 ms

78/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.3 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

danielhuff.com

153 ms

css

21 ms

font-awesome.min.css

123 ms

animate.css

236 ms

prettyPhoto.css

176 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Danielhuff.com, 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Danielhuff.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 673.0 kB (18%)

Content Size

3.8 MB

After Optimization

3.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Danielhuff.com main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 12.6 kB

  • Original 15.5 kB
  • After minification 10.8 kB
  • After compression 2.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.7 kB, which is 31% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.6 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 674 B

  • Original 3.0 MB
  • After minification 3.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Danielhuff images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 383.3 kB

  • Original 527.6 kB
  • After minification 502.1 kB
  • After compression 144.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 383.3 kB or 73% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 276.5 kB

  • Original 319.2 kB
  • After minification 258.7 kB
  • After compression 42.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Danielhuff.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 276.5 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (77%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

7

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Danielhuff. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

danielhuff.com

danielhuff.com

153 ms

css

css

21 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

123 ms

animate.css

animate.css

236 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

176 ms

slick.css

slick.css

125 ms

settings.css

settings.css

277 ms

style.css

style.css

388 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

211 ms

default.css

default.css

190 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

374 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

260 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

351 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

453 ms

jquery.animateNumber.min.js

jquery.animateNumber.min.js

328 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

369 ms

jquery.easypiechart.min.js

jquery.easypiechart.min.js

381 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

459 ms

jquery.sharrre.min.js

jquery.sharrre.min.js

457 ms

jquery.elevateZoom-3.0.8.min.js

jquery.elevateZoom-3.0.8.min.js

456 ms

jquery.nav.js

jquery.nav.js

461 ms

jquery.placeholder.js

jquery.placeholder.js

458 ms

jquery.totemticker.min.js

jquery.totemticker.min.js

502 ms

twitterfeed.js

twitterfeed.js

600 ms

mailChimp.js

mailChimp.js

524 ms

jquery.nicescroll.min.js

jquery.nicescroll.min.js

534 ms

script.js

script.js

528 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

510 ms

logo.png

logo.png

157 ms

bg5.jpg

bg5.jpg

156 ms

font

font

8 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

186 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

155 ms

timer.png

timer.png

51 ms

bg-1.PNG

bg-1.PNG

1062 ms

Accessibility Review

danielhuff.com accessibility score

56

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

danielhuff.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

danielhuff.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Danielhuff.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Danielhuff.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

danielhuff.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Danielhuff. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: