3.8 sec in total
34 ms
3.4 sec
453 ms
Click here to check amazing Daniel J Siegel content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about danieljsiegel.com
Serving Delco and the Main Line for 38 years, Havertown lawyer Daniel J. Siegel and his firm represent clients in personal injury and workers' compensation matters, and draft wills, powers of att...
Visit danieljsiegel.comWe analyzed Danieljsiegel.com page load time and found that the first response time was 34 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
danieljsiegel.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
65/100
10%
Value12.9 s
0/100
25%
Value11.6 s
4/100
10%
Value2,720 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.251
49/100
15%
Value22.9 s
1/100
10%
34 ms
2248 ms
199 ms
188 ms
239 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Danieljsiegel.com, 17% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Danieljsiegel.com.
Page size can be reduced by 821.7 kB (34%)
2.4 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Danieljsiegel.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 91.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 91.7 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 256.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Daniel J Siegel needs image optimization as it can save up to 256.7 kB or 31% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 451.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 451.7 kB or 35% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Danieljsiegel.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 21.6 kB or 12% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (77%)
57
13
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Daniel J Siegel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
danieljsiegel.com
34 ms
danieljsiegel.com
2248 ms
font-awesome.css
199 ms
owl.carousel.css
188 ms
bootstrap.css
239 ms
custom.css
190 ms
responsive.css
192 ms
css
40 ms
google-review.css
105 ms
style.min.css
164 ms
styles.css
221 ms
style.css
231 ms
wpac-time.js
192 ms
js
67 ms
adsbygoogle.js
53 ms
counter.js
48 ms
dashicons.min.css
310 ms
display-opinions-light.css
309 ms
font-awesome.min.css
308 ms
index.js
192 ms
index.js
193 ms
new-tab.js
195 ms
api.js
58 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
196 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
197 ms
index.js
198 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
200 ms
jquery.min.js
202 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
202 ms
underscore.min.js
205 ms
backbone.min.js
205 ms
front-end-deps.js
303 ms
front-end.js
303 ms
jquery.min.js
305 ms
bootstrap.min.js
304 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
305 ms
navAccordion.js
306 ms
custom.js
305 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
71 ms
header-bg.png
58 ms
Building-e1643813605635.jpg
252 ms
banner-innr-bg.png
58 ms
footer-bg.png
141 ms
recent-success-bg.png
59 ms
show_ads_impl.js
94 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
107 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf
180 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_N_XbMZhKg.ttf
185 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_DjQbMZhKg.ttf
203 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_GbQbMZhKg.ttf
202 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
185 ms
Qw3JZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5EUCGZ2dIn0FyA96fCTU4VRLSzt.ttf
203 ms
Qw3JZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5EUCGZ2dIn0FyA96fCTtIJRLSzt.ttf
202 ms
Qw3JZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5EUCGZ2dIn0FyA96fCT6oJRLSzt.ttf
202 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHjxsAXC-v.ttf
202 ms
S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI5wq_Gwfo.ttf
218 ms
zrt_lookup.html
155 ms
ads
182 ms
t.php
195 ms
recaptcha__en.js
128 ms
ilnksrvr.aspx
151 ms
logo.png
27 ms
OfVJ5dXRqwI
137 ms
www-player.css
13 ms
www-embed-player.js
27 ms
base.js
51 ms
ad_status.js
136 ms
XSOeYOgfx9Jh0OnrBRoGZITK3RITQeOfJZOsiQTg9Ss.js
79 ms
embed.js
36 ms
id
32 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
10 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
9 ms
danieljsiegel.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
danieljsiegel.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
danieljsiegel.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Danieljsiegel.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Danieljsiegel.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
danieljsiegel.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Daniel J Siegel. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: