Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

danieljsiegel.com

Havertown, Delco, and Main Line Attorneys | Personal injury and Workers Compensation Law Firm Near Me | Wills & Estate Planning Lawyer in Delaware Cou...

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

34 ms

Resources Loaded

3.4 sec

Page Rendered

453 ms

danieljsiegel.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Daniel J Siegel content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about danieljsiegel.com

Serving Delco and the Main Line for 38 years, Havertown lawyer Daniel J. Siegel and his firm represent clients in personal injury and workers' compensation matters, and draft wills, powers of att...

Visit danieljsiegel.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Danieljsiegel.com page load time and found that the first response time was 34 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

danieljsiegel.com performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

65/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.6 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,720 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.251

49/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.9 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

danieljsiegel.com

34 ms

danieljsiegel.com

2248 ms

font-awesome.css

199 ms

owl.carousel.css

188 ms

bootstrap.css

239 ms

Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Danieljsiegel.com, 17% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Danieljsiegel.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 821.7 kB (34%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Danieljsiegel.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 91.7 kB

  • Original 114.7 kB
  • After minification 110.5 kB
  • After compression 23.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 91.7 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 256.7 kB

  • Original 838.4 kB
  • After minification 581.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Daniel J Siegel needs image optimization as it can save up to 256.7 kB or 31% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 451.7 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB
  • After compression 847.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 451.7 kB or 35% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 21.6 kB

  • Original 179.1 kB
  • After minification 179.0 kB
  • After compression 157.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Danieljsiegel.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 21.6 kB or 12% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (77%)

Requests Now

57

After Optimization

13

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Daniel J Siegel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

danieljsiegel.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

danieljsiegel.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

danieljsiegel.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Danieljsiegel.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Danieljsiegel.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Daniel J Siegel. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: