Report Summary

  • 79

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    86% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 72% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

daniellaporte.com

Welcome! - Daniel La Porte

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

362 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

986 ms

daniellaporte.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to daniellaporte.com homepage info - get ready to check Daniel La Porte best content right away, or after learning these important things about daniellaporte.com

Visit daniellaporte.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Daniellaporte.com page load time and found that the first response time was 362 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

daniellaporte.com performance score

79

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

51/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

66/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.9 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.219

57/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.2 s

94/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.daniellelaporte.com

362 ms

jquery-ui.css

9 ms

links-shortcode.css

33 ms

css

32 ms

style.css

66 ms

Our browser made a total of 102 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Daniellaporte.com, 4% (4 requests) were made to Api.soundcloud.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to F.vimeocdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (926 ms) relates to the external source Daniellelaporte.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.8 MB (31%)

Content Size

9.0 MB

After Optimization

6.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Daniellaporte.com main page is 9.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 5.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 75.4 kB

  • Original 99.5 kB
  • After minification 92.5 kB
  • After compression 24.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 75.4 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 279.0 kB

  • Original 5.9 MB
  • After minification 5.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Daniel La Porte images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 1.5 MB

  • Original 1.9 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB
  • After compression 439.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.5 MB or 77% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 947.5 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 864.0 kB
  • After compression 118.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Daniellaporte.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 947.5 kB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (51%)

Requests Now

91

After Optimization

45

The browser has sent 91 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Daniel La Porte. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

daniellaporte.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

daniellaporte.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

daniellaporte.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Daniellaporte.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Daniellaporte.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Daniel La Porte. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: