Tools & Wizards About Us
darvin.solutions screenshot

Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

darvin.solutions

DARVIN | THE TACTICAL INFORMATION HUB FOR REALTIME DATA DEMANDS | livestreaming

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

870 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

58 ms

darvin.solutions screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing DARVIN content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about darvin.solutions

Increase the effectiveness and safety of your teams in the field with our DARVIN LIVELINK solutions. Start a mobile live video and data communication at any location on earth to transmit important and...

Visit darvin.solutions

Key Findings

We analyzed Darvin.solutions page load time and found that the first response time was 870 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

darvin.solutions performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

65/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.6 s

53/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value640 ms

46/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.7 s

29/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.darvin.live

870 ms

minified.js

34 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

31 ms

polyfill.min.js

280 ms

thunderbolt-commons.1e70fbb2.bundle.min.js

71 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Darvin.solutions, 33% (16 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 24% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (870 ms) relates to the external source Darvin.live.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 388.2 kB (42%)

Content Size

918.7 kB

After Optimization

530.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Darvin.solutions main page is 918.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 392.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 301.2 kB

  • Original 392.2 kB
  • After minification 390.6 kB
  • After compression 91.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 301.2 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 25.1 kB

  • Original 229.5 kB
  • After minification 204.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, DARVIN needs image optimization as it can save up to 25.1 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 61.9 kB

  • Original 297.0 kB
  • After minification 297.0 kB
  • After compression 235.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 61.9 kB or 21% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (31%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of DARVIN. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.darvin.live

www.darvin.live

870 ms

minified.js

minified.js

34 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

31 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

280 ms

thunderbolt-commons.1e70fbb2.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.1e70fbb2.bundle.min.js

71 ms

main.42e492e1.bundle.min.js

main.42e492e1.bundle.min.js

71 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

70 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

71 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

71 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

72 ms

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

71 ms

actic_logo_white_edited_edited_edited_pn.png

actic_logo_white_edited_edited_edited_pn.png

232 ms

efa62e_d674dee3fa75406d8f699becb879370af000.jpg

efa62e_d674dee3fa75406d8f699becb879370af000.jpg

231 ms

darvin_livecore.png

darvin_livecore.png

332 ms

efa62e_72de525a98af46438f4b99c0fd346b09~mv2.jpg

efa62e_72de525a98af46438f4b99c0fd346b09~mv2.jpg

346 ms

efa62e_22037f467b234952a5a2c24e787ac05f~mv2.jpg

efa62e_22037f467b234952a5a2c24e787ac05f~mv2.jpg

353 ms

efa62e_98e502c698a1462fad69253860f47ec6~mv2.jpg

efa62e_98e502c698a1462fad69253860f47ec6~mv2.jpg

474 ms

efa62e_1121c128b0104fe5a120b1e8b961d1f3f000.jpg

efa62e_1121c128b0104fe5a120b1e8b961d1f3f000.jpg

461 ms

efa62e_b3ec77f2a3c94fe7b7a5dfb3d5c31e36~mv2.png

efa62e_b3ec77f2a3c94fe7b7a5dfb3d5c31e36~mv2.png

372 ms

efa62e_d6cadb8b87704b419c1884622e599953~mv2.png

efa62e_d6cadb8b87704b419c1884622e599953~mv2.png

544 ms

efa62e_c7447e1aac2f405e9e609570ce062028~mv2.png

efa62e_c7447e1aac2f405e9e609570ce062028~mv2.png

538 ms

efa62e_7d8f10352e3f427cbb0475bedc545b14~mv2.png

efa62e_7d8f10352e3f427cbb0475bedc545b14~mv2.png

571 ms

efa62e_0bee3f46e2b94149bcc7fc3e77439198~mv2.png

efa62e_0bee3f46e2b94149bcc7fc3e77439198~mv2.png

553 ms

efa62e_d3a2f25863724246b1d330af284454c8~mv2.png

efa62e_d3a2f25863724246b1d330af284454c8~mv2.png

660 ms

efa62e_486826ed26c748a3935f9490b980d928~mv2.png

efa62e_486826ed26c748a3935f9490b980d928~mv2.png

620 ms

efa62e_3267f9cf3c1d4e6098c0753865b940b7~mv2.png

efa62e_3267f9cf3c1d4e6098c0753865b940b7~mv2.png

692 ms

11062b_77378fc0da68439ebd8fd24a2f51e50cf000.jpg

11062b_77378fc0da68439ebd8fd24a2f51e50cf000.jpg

651 ms

actic_logo_white_edited_edited_edited.png

actic_logo_white_edited_edited_edited.png

644 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

120 ms

e2b9cbeb-fa8e-41cd-8a6a-46044b29ba52.woff

e2b9cbeb-fa8e-41cd-8a6a-46044b29ba52.woff

8 ms

113 ms

128 ms

117 ms

126 ms

113 ms

113 ms

163 ms

163 ms

161 ms

163 ms

158 ms

158 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

5 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

17 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

5 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

12 ms

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

4 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

5 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

3 ms

Accessibility Review

darvin.solutions accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

darvin.solutions best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

darvin.solutions SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Darvin.solutions can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Darvin.solutions main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

darvin.solutions

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of DARVIN. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: