11.2 sec in total
1.6 sec
8.3 sec
1.2 sec
Visit datefinder.singles now to see the best up-to-date Date Finder content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about datefinder.singles
Visit datefinder.singlesWe analyzed Datefinder.singles page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 9.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
datefinder.singles performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
41/100
10%
Value5.2 s
24/100
25%
Value8.2 s
20/100
10%
Value1,470 ms
14/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value8.2 s
41/100
10%
1598 ms
1296 ms
3410 ms
129 ms
193 ms
Our browser made a total of 170 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (85 requests) were addressed to the original Datefinder.singles, 9% (15 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net and 4% (6 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Datefinder.singles.
Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (45%)
3.9 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Datefinder.singles main page is 3.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 121.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 121.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 117.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Date Finder images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 925.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 925.0 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 582.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Datefinder.singles needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 582.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 86 (54%)
159
73
The browser has sent 159 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Date Finder. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 47 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.datefinder.singles
1598 ms
cometchatcss.php
1296 ms
cometchatjs.php
3410 ms
frontend.css
129 ms
bbpress.css
193 ms
form_style.css
146 ms
settings.css
254 ms
foundation-nonresponsive.min.css
355 ms
font-awesome.min.css
312 ms
prettyPhoto.css
309 ms
default.css
475 ms
style.css
374 ms
responsive.css
398 ms
css
26 ms
css
38 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
454 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
393 ms
dashicons.min.css
464 ms
main.css
525 ms
jquery.js
654 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
526 ms
widget-groups.min.js
527 ms
paid-memberships-pro.js
588 ms
plupload.full.min.js
745 ms
confirm.min.js
591 ms
script.js
652 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
717 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
842 ms
modernizr.foundation.js
725 ms
global.js
782 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
870 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
817 ms
main.js
847 ms
css
15 ms
adsbygoogle.js
9 ms
conversion.js
18 ms
editor.js
727 ms
underscore.min.js
741 ms
backbone.min.js
748 ms
rtMedia.backbone.js
744 ms
foundation.min.js
905 ms
scripts.js
862 ms
app.js
774 ms
comment-reply.min.js
817 ms
widgets.js
83 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
75 ms
app.css
165 ms
logo-main.png
192 ms
cf605193341aa78cdacdfa68435b0342
158 ms
18ade740faea9ef295b07ba536e98ec1-bpthumb.jpg
153 ms
815e664695ce8de7c19f56f6d78e68f0-bpthumb.jpg
192 ms
6daf5fa5a6bf7c805220f9188b68bfe1-bpthumb.jpg
154 ms
Free-Image-310x177.jpg
150 ms
dreamstime_s_39114551-310x177.jpg
154 ms
c01410d6c6e4ebc5cf50ad1e272ccf33-bpfull.jpg
148 ms
c66f3c3f05d3e4235ff8730d53571cb6-bpfull.jpg
399 ms
15f381b4f6f44b7707ccf066a785b7ef-bpfull.jpg
399 ms
e8de0f7c5627489fc70c7ceb0312b1a1-bpfull.jpg
319 ms
steven-150x150.jpg
188 ms
joshua-150x150.jpg
187 ms
jane-150x150.jpg
317 ms
1299285a060fddec98676a0fde80847c
393 ms
logo-sticky.png
181 ms
profile_users.jpg
1060 ms
sexy_lady_on_right_shape.png
1292 ms
looking_for_sweets_small_text.png
179 ms
arrow.png
310 ms
sdk.js
177 ms
blue_pattern.gif
271 ms
gray_pattern.gif
268 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3SZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
34 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
712 ms
1EqTbJWOZQBfhZ0e3RL9uvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
32 ms
0DeoTBMnW4sOpD0Zb8OQSALUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf
31 ms
ca-pub-5770584214816695.js
828 ms
zrt_lookup.html
975 ms
show_ads_impl.js
590 ms
12243265_116090788785806_1949034605098891518_n.jpg
1054 ms
gray_pattern.gif
550 ms
map-bg.png
547 ms
11217805_10153490314384884_8070003644360947353_n.jpg
1045 ms
910 ms
xd_arbiter.php
729 ms
xd_arbiter.php
954 ms
952 ms
black_pattern.gif
675 ms
up_page.png
677 ms
analytics.js
676 ms
10676187_1612885592264280_7468461949225212004_n.jpg
972 ms
cometchat_receive.php
1299 ms
icon.png
455 ms
icon.png
456 ms
icon.png
456 ms
icon.png
470 ms
icon.png
470 ms
icon.png
529 ms
icon.png
529 ms
hide.png
547 ms
cometchat.png
583 ms
bgrepeat.png
582 ms
pointer.png
594 ms
tabbottomwhosonline.gif
671 ms
loader.gif
673 ms
bullets.png
689 ms
large_left.png
688 ms
large_right.png
693 ms
blank.png
703 ms
Kx86Eoa3A5Q
522 ms
Ijrl8BdjNP8
521 ms
10432156_300208480180184_4318113020511875776_n.jpg
471 ms
12813928_546497895524058_5102198655588063602_n.jpg
592 ms
11270057_924030910989933_7738116430560746805_n.jpg
594 ms
ads
608 ms
259789_106018469492026_5853795_o.jpg
487 ms
12247140_965369336840353_9032494767938060878_n.jpg
500 ms
12804871_1262409703785617_5494562481941807640_n.jpg
404 ms
osd.js
251 ms
ads
628 ms
10506738_10150004552801856_220367501106153455_o.jpg
309 ms
collect
181 ms
10377628_663427847082617_1860135980825839014_n.jpg
382 ms
12400796_1009748122429729_5031953587476162879_n.jpg
364 ms
12316320_1663754273898164_2710765489191300954_n.jpg
378 ms
1931088_949547251789963_1927254884437390888_n.jpg
391 ms
12801152_1687604884839705_6465701177380999686_n.jpg
372 ms
UlIqmHJn-SK.gif
206 ms
xd_arbiter.php
72 ms
158 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
78 ms
www-embed-player.js
104 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
38 ms
ad_status.js
50 ms
QHD8zigcbDB8aPfIoaupKOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf
97 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
106 ms
m_js_controller.js
32 ms
abg.js
45 ms
favicon
63 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
62 ms
nessie_icon_thin_arrow_big_white.png
32 ms
s
32 ms
x_button_blue2.png
20 ms
131 ms
adj
108 ms
beacon
88 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
14 ms
31 ms
0
111 ms
surly.js
162 ms
index.html
249 ms
verify_selector.js
156 ms
blank.gif
201 ms
print.css
80 ms
ba.html
48 ms
pixel
44 ms
4.gif
119 ms
lidar.js
17 ms
sbhK2lTE.js
17 ms
verifyr.js
63 ms
cTrvNaRi.html
27 ms
pixel
130 ms
pixel
144 ms
4311.js
97 ms
beacon.js
125 ms
0
173 ms
bg.png
114 ms
adchoices.en.png
161 ms
setuid
90 ms
Rejuvenation_728x90_logo.gif
46 ms
Rejuvenation_728x90_bg.jpg
87 ms
sd
7 ms
datefinder.singles accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
datefinder.singles best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
datefinder.singles SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Datefinder.singles can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Datefinder.singles main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
datefinder.singles
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Date Finder. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: