2.3 sec in total
214 ms
1.7 sec
402 ms
Visit datesafeproject.org now to see the best up-to-date Datesafeproject content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about datesafeproject.org
Join the millions inspired to have candid conversations about asking first, bystander intervention, and supporting sexual assault survivors.
Visit datesafeproject.orgWe analyzed Datesafeproject.org page load time and found that the first response time was 214 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
datesafeproject.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.7 s
5/100
10%
Value38.1 s
0/100
25%
Value9.4 s
12/100
10%
Value430 ms
65/100
30%
Value0.059
98/100
15%
Value19.9 s
2/100
10%
214 ms
228 ms
69 ms
81 ms
70 ms
Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Datesafeproject.org, 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Assets.juicer.io. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (552 ms) belongs to the original domain Datesafeproject.org.
Page size can be reduced by 989.6 kB (67%)
1.5 MB
494.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Datesafeproject.org main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 666.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.8 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Datesafeproject needs image optimization as it can save up to 20.3 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 450.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 450.6 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 486.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Datesafeproject.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 486.8 kB or 73% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (82%)
33
6
The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Datesafeproject. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
datesafeproject.org
214 ms
www.datesafeproject.org
228 ms
css
69 ms
css
81 ms
af7cc463_ai1ec_parsed_css.css
70 ms
embed.css
36 ms
bbpress.css
137 ms
wpProQuiz_front.min.css
138 ms
style.css
138 ms
slick.css
139 ms
normalize.css
140 ms
foundation.min.css
215 ms
font-awesome.min.css
203 ms
style.css
207 ms
media-screens.css
212 ms
jquery.js
213 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
213 ms
embed-no-jquery.js
36 ms
front.css
270 ms
learndash_template_style.css
272 ms
ssba.min.js
273 ms
slick.min.js
275 ms
foundation.min.js
276 ms
slideout.min.js
266 ms
global.js
323 ms
wp-embed.min.js
326 ms
learndash_template_script.js
327 ms
count.js
328 ms
af7cc463_ai1ec_parsed_css.css
552 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
263 ms
bbpress.css
274 ms
wpProQuiz_front.min.css
280 ms
style.css
280 ms
jquery.js
271 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
208 ms
front.css
205 ms
learndash_template_style.css
207 ms
ssba.min.js
206 ms
slick.min.js
214 ms
foundation.min.js
267 ms
slideout.min.js
271 ms
global.js
213 ms
wp-embed.min.js
211 ms
learndash_template_script.js
217 ms
count.js
271 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
417 ms
analytics.js
123 ms
about-us.png
417 ms
info-img.png
243 ms
count.js
175 ms
ajax-loader.gif
182 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
184 ms
collect
30 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
70 ms
collect
76 ms
datesafeproject.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
datesafeproject.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
datesafeproject.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Datesafeproject.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Datesafeproject.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
datesafeproject.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Datesafeproject. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: