5 sec in total
933 ms
3.8 sec
217 ms
Welcome to datingmail.ru homepage info - get ready to check Datingmail best content right away, or after learning these important things about datingmail.ru
Visit datingmail.ruWe analyzed Datingmail.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 933 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
datingmail.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.5 s
96/100
10%
Value1.5 s
100/100
25%
Value5.9 s
48/100
10%
Value1,170 ms
21/100
30%
Value1.022
2/100
15%
Value12.5 s
14/100
10%
933 ms
292 ms
1108 ms
625 ms
377 ms
Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Datingmail.ru, 82% (75 requests) were made to Cdneu.wambacdn.net and 4% (4 requests) were made to Top-fwz1.mail.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Cdneu.wambacdn.net.
Page size can be reduced by 2.9 MB (67%)
4.4 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Datingmail.ru main page is 4.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 236.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 45.2 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 236.0 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 82.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Datingmail needs image optimization as it can save up to 82.0 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 915.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 915.5 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.7 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Datingmail.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.7 MB or 69% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (58%)
90
38
The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Datingmail. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
datingmail.ru
933 ms
Stats.min.js
292 ms
base.css
1108 ms
style.css
625 ms
layers.css
377 ms
ui-userbar.css
381 ms
SearchForm.css
719 ms
slider.css
370 ms
NewFaces.css
532 ms
MainTop.css
541 ms
UserFace2.css
715 ms
style202786467.css
702 ms
lib_versions.js
705 ms
routes.js
703 ms
polyfill.js
783 ms
jquery-1.11.1.min.js
868 ms
jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js
787 ms
lodash.4.2.1.compat.min.js
797 ms
knockout-3.2.0.js
798 ms
rx.all.compat.js
1182 ms
bowser.js
868 ms
require.js
880 ms
code.js
966 ms
config.js
948 ms
components.js
1442 ms
web.full.css
964 ms
icons.css
1203 ms
icons.css
1301 ms
stickers.css
1049 ms
en.js
1200 ms
core.js
1202 ms
moment.js
1201 ms
angular.min.js
1300 ms
angular-resource.min.js
1264 ms
Modal.js
1265 ms
mamba-app.js
1274 ms
paymentMethods.js
1345 ms
advert.js
1066 ms
vipModule.js
998 ms
photolineModule.js
1016 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.js
1014 ms
maketopModule.js
905 ms
applicationChargeModule.js
896 ms
giftModule.js
1000 ms
leaderModule.js
928 ms
1584120300_square.jpg
288 ms
1600291997_square.jpg
284 ms
1591929695_square.jpg
278 ms
1599102505_square.jpg
287 ms
icon_menu-new.png
91 ms
l3.gif
86 ms
icon_1.png
85 ms
icon_11.png
87 ms
icon_13.png
91 ms
icon_14.png
86 ms
icon_2.png
275 ms
1.jpg
282 ms
1571907624_square.jpg
281 ms
1597788419_square.jpg
282 ms
Login.js
264 ms
arrowSearch.sprite.svg
251 ms
photos.png
243 ms
mark-online.png
241 ms
new_faces_reload.jpg
244 ms
icon_reload.png
245 ms
arrows.png
238 ms
circleOnline.small.svg
238 ms
camera.sprite.svg
240 ms
cup.png
233 ms
icons16.png
336 ms
icons13.png
260 ms
base.png
260 ms
registration-sprite.png
261 ms
Registration.js
265 ms
socialButton.png
265 ms
adt.sprite.svg
330 ms
hit
389 ms
AuthStatusMonitor.js
398 ms
init.js
130 ms
code.js
638 ms
velocity.js
242 ms
Select.js
118 ms
Mambarber.js
135 ms
init.js
361 ms
slider-handle.png
96 ms
counter
129 ms
invisible.sprite.svg
253 ms
counter
198 ms
noPhoto.sprite.svg
85 ms
SynchroMambaTab.js
131 ms
pop.php
212 ms
tracker
136 ms
datingmail.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
datingmail.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
datingmail.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a valid hreflang
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Datingmail.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Datingmail.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
datingmail.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Datingmail. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: