Tools & Wizards About Us
datingplace.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 90

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    91% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

Page Load Speed

694 ms in total

First Response

105 ms

Resources Loaded

539 ms

Page Rendered

50 ms

datingplace.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to datingplace.com homepage info - get ready to check Datingplace best content right away, or after learning these important things about datingplace.com

Visit datingplace.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Datingplace.com page load time and found that the first response time was 105 ms and then it took 589 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

datingplace.com performance score

90

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

96/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

82/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.7 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value140 ms

95/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.024

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.4 s

60/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

datingplace.com

105 ms

www.latam.match.com

163 ms

deprecated

57 ms

polyfills-78c92fac7aa8fdd8.js

72 ms

webpack-f3c7f0f8437f1a40.js

99 ms

Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Datingplace.com, 94% (15 requests) were made to Latam.match.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (208 ms) relates to the external source Latam.match.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 44.1 kB (8%)

Content Size

587.6 kB

After Optimization

543.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Datingplace.com main page is 587.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 467.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 1.8 kB
  • After minification 1.8 kB
  • After compression 687 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.1 kB or 61% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 11.8 kB

  • Original 467.9 kB
  • After minification 456.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Datingplace images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 30.4 kB

  • Original 112.9 kB
  • After minification 101.2 kB
  • After compression 82.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 30.4 kB or 27% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 858 B

  • Original 5.1 kB
  • After minification 5.1 kB
  • After compression 4.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Datingplace.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 858 B or 17% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (92%)

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

1

  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Datingplace. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

datingplace.com

datingplace.com

105 ms

www.latam.match.com

www.latam.match.com

163 ms

deprecated

deprecated

57 ms

polyfills-78c92fac7aa8fdd8.js

polyfills-78c92fac7aa8fdd8.js

72 ms

webpack-f3c7f0f8437f1a40.js

webpack-f3c7f0f8437f1a40.js

99 ms

framework-56eb74ff06128874.js

framework-56eb74ff06128874.js

183 ms

main-b3b93eeeb06f160f.js

main-b3b93eeeb06f160f.js

208 ms

_app-3994033f31a422e3.js

_app-3994033f31a422e3.js

113 ms

716-1293e4947644e2b9.js

716-1293e4947644e2b9.js

150 ms

4165-b9e813e49c437e6a.js

4165-b9e813e49c437e6a.js

111 ms

8837-0db60ab18851b10f.js

8837-0db60ab18851b10f.js

132 ms

9855-16246f1189dfbfe4.js

9855-16246f1189dfbfe4.js

152 ms

8211-f46fc55948856e9a.js

8211-f46fc55948856e9a.js

150 ms

deprecated-b17cd10bf77497a1.js

deprecated-b17cd10bf77497a1.js

165 ms

_buildManifest.js

_buildManifest.js

187 ms

_ssgManifest.js

_ssgManifest.js

186 ms

Accessibility Review

datingplace.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

datingplace.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

datingplace.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Datingplace.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Datingplace.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

datingplace.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Datingplace. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: