1.4 sec in total
228 ms
968 ms
225 ms
Visit davidfowl.com now to see the best up-to-date Davidfowl content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about davidfowl.com
Visit davidfowl.comWe analyzed Davidfowl.com page load time and found that the first response time was 228 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
davidfowl.com performance score
228 ms
92 ms
26 ms
199 ms
681 ms
Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Davidfowl.com, 24% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 12% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (681 ms) belongs to the original domain Davidfowl.com.
Page size can be reduced by 105.9 kB (63%)
168.1 kB
62.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Davidfowl.com main page is 168.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 159.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 6.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.0 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 99.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 99.9 kB or 63% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (73%)
11
3
The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Davidfowl. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
davidfowl.com
228 ms
screen.css
92 ms
css
26 ms
prism.css
199 ms
jquery.js
681 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
160 ms
index.js
178 ms
prism.js
205 ms
normalize.css
116 ms
analytics.js
8 ms
collect
16 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
8 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
13 ms
eCpfeMZI7q4jLksXVRWPQy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
16 ms
lJAvZoKA5NttpPc9yc6lPfEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf
23 ms
icons.woff
86 ms
count.js
45 ms
davidfowl.com SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Davidfowl.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Davidfowl.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
davidfowl.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Davidfowl. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: