Tools & Wizards About Us
davis-stuart.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 70

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

davis-stuart.org

davisstuart -

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

536 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

80 ms

davis-stuart.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to davis-stuart.org homepage info - get ready to check Davis Stuart best content right away, or after learning these important things about davis-stuart.org

Visit davis-stuart.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Davis-stuart.org page load time and found that the first response time was 536 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

davis-stuart.org performance score

70

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

36/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

43/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.4 s

40/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value140 ms

95/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.8 s

78/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

davis-stuart.org

536 ms

davis-stuart.org

783 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

49 ms

style.min.css

38 ms

style.css

41 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Davis-stuart.org, 7% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (783 ms) belongs to the original domain Davis-stuart.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 59.2 kB (26%)

Content Size

228.1 kB

After Optimization

168.9 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Davis-stuart.org main page is 228.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 95.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 48.9 kB

  • Original 58.9 kB
  • After minification 54.3 kB
  • After compression 10.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.9 kB or 83% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 3.8 kB

  • Original 95.4 kB
  • After minification 95.4 kB
  • After compression 91.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 6.5 kB

  • Original 73.8 kB
  • After minification 73.8 kB
  • After compression 67.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Davis-stuart.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (83%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

4

  • AJAX
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Davis Stuart. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

davis-stuart.org

davis-stuart.org

536 ms

davis-stuart.org

davis-stuart.org

783 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

49 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

38 ms

style.css

style.css

41 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

30 ms

slick.min.css

slick.min.css

36 ms

jquery.sidr.dark.css

jquery.sidr.dark.css

40 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

54 ms

css

css

35 ms

style.css

style.css

76 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

53 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

53 ms

font

font

16 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

57 ms

skip-link-focus-fix.js

skip-link-focus-fix.js

57 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

58 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

57 ms

jquery.sidr.min.js

jquery.sidr.min.js

55 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

58 ms

jquery.matchHeight.min.js

jquery.matchHeight.min.js

68 ms

jquery.marquee.js

jquery.marquee.js

66 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

68 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

71 ms

script.js

script.js

70 ms

font

font

35 ms

aft-icons.ttf

aft-icons.ttf

526 ms

Accessibility Review

davis-stuart.org accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

davis-stuart.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

davis-stuart.org SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Davis-stuart.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Davis-stuart.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

davis-stuart.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Davis Stuart. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: