3.3 sec in total
173 ms
1.4 sec
1.7 sec
Welcome to dayback.com homepage info - get ready to check Day Back best content for Netherlands right away, or after learning these important things about dayback.com
Resource scheduling, calendar analytics, and long timescales: designed to be customized. For Google, Salesforce, Microsoft 365, Basecamp, and FileMaker.
Visit dayback.comWe analyzed Dayback.com page load time and found that the first response time was 173 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
dayback.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.1 s
3/100
10%
Value10.3 s
0/100
25%
Value7.6 s
26/100
10%
Value1,750 ms
10/100
30%
Value0.111
87/100
15%
Value17.7 s
4/100
10%
173 ms
332 ms
45 ms
46 ms
101 ms
Our browser made a total of 109 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (92 requests) were addressed to the original Dayback.com, 6% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (341 ms) belongs to the original domain Dayback.com.
Page size can be reduced by 139.8 kB (12%)
1.2 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Dayback.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 515.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 123.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 123.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Day Back images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 8.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 8.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dayback.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 89 (90%)
99
10
The browser has sent 99 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Day Back. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 66 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
dayback.com
173 ms
dayback.com
332 ms
footnotes-nottbrpl0.min.css
45 ms
style-blocks.build.css
46 ms
style.css
101 ms
style.min.css
56 ms
styles.css
47 ms
tp_twitter_plugin.css
47 ms
twenty20.css
66 ms
bootstrap.min.css
77 ms
ulisting-style.css
69 ms
stm-grid.css
73 ms
font-awesome.min.css
90 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.css
101 ms
select2.min.css
93 ms
ion.rangeSlider.min.css
95 ms
toastr.css
115 ms
dashicons.min.css
112 ms
css
61 ms
altitude-pro_override2021.css
103 ms
front-end.css
109 ms
style.css
107 ms
jquery.lazyloadxt.fadein.css
109 ms
a3_lazy_load.min.css
115 ms
jquery.min.js
126 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
124 ms
iubenda_cs.js
62 ms
vue.js
147 ms
bootstrap.js
157 ms
select2.full.js
145 ms
toastr.js
144 ms
js.cookie.js
147 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.js
172 ms
stm-listing.js
175 ms
ion.rangeSlider.min.js
176 ms
Sortable.min.js
180 ms
vue-w3c-valid.js
179 ms
vuedraggable.min.js
184 ms
animated-scroll-to.js
188 ms
70 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
58 ms
css2
84 ms
buttons.js
46 ms
api.js
83 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
172 ms
wpforms-full.min.css
151 ms
ulisting-main.js
147 ms
tinymce.min.js
158 ms
vue-easy-tinymce.min.js
152 ms
vue2-datepicker.js
139 ms
vue-resource.js
133 ms
vuejs-paginate.js
127 ms
stm-google-map.js
126 ms
picturefill.min.js
114 ms
codemirror.min.js
341 ms
autoload.js
211 ms
jquery.twenty20.js
211 ms
jquery.event.move.js
337 ms
core.min.js
333 ms
tabs.min.js
330 ms
menu.min.js
331 ms
dom-ready.min.js
326 ms
hooks.min.js
329 ms
i18n.min.js
325 ms
a11y.min.js
328 ms
autocomplete.min.js
316 ms
moment.min.js
316 ms
stm-pricing-plan.js
296 ms
user-plan-detail.js
296 ms
stripe-card-component.js
293 ms
stripe-my-card.js
286 ms
dismiss.js
271 ms
byline.334a.min.js
269 ms
comment-reply.min.js
266 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
264 ms
superfish.min.js
264 ms
superfish.args.min.js
261 ms
skip-links.min.js
261 ms
global.js
259 ms
responsive-menus.min.js
258 ms
dayback-purchase.js
332 ms
jquery.lazyloadxt.extra.min.js
330 ms
jquery.lazyloadxt.srcset.min.js
330 ms
jquery.lazyloadxt.extend.js
328 ms
ulisting-quickview.js
326 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
326 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
328 ms
mailcheck.min.js
329 ms
punycode.min.js
325 ms
analytics.js
252 ms
utils.min.js
224 ms
wpforms.min.js
221 ms
DayBackLogoForFSReceipts.png
154 ms
WaveSplash.jpg
97 ms
lazy_placeholder.gif
94 ms
Leana-345_MD.jpg
94 ms
ChiyokoYoshida_NMSunset_Optimized.jpg
99 ms
symbol-defs.svg
95 ms
dbklogoblurredwhite.png
288 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpYCMNLA3JRdf.woff
82 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoooCMNLA3JRdf.woff
180 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaooCMNLA3JRdf.woff
254 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEooCMNLA3JRdf.woff
253 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaooCMNLA3JRdf.woff
254 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao4CMNLA3JRdf.woff
255 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
81 ms
wARDj0u
24 ms
collect
226 ms
js
75 ms
dayback.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
dayback.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
dayback.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dayback.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Dayback.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
dayback.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Day Back. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: