Tools & Wizards About Us
deaconlloyd.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 90

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    91% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

deaconlloyd.com

Product Management Consultants | Deacon Lloyd Associates

Page Load Speed

306 ms in total

First Response

40 ms

Resources Loaded

184 ms

Page Rendered

82 ms

deaconlloyd.com screenshot

About Website

Visit deaconlloyd.com now to see the best up-to-date Deacon Lloyd content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about deaconlloyd.com

Visit deaconlloyd.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Deaconlloyd.com page load time and found that the first response time was 40 ms and then it took 266 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

deaconlloyd.com performance score

90

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

89/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

86/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.8 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value230 ms

87/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.7 s

80/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

deaconlloyd.com

40 ms

theme.css

22 ms

jquery.min.js

9 ms

bootstrap.min.js

26 ms

bootstrap.min.css

11 ms

Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 38% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Deaconlloyd.com, 31% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 13% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (53 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 3.9 kB (2%)

Content Size

167.5 kB

After Optimization

163.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Deaconlloyd.com main page is 167.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 98.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-55%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 2.1 kB
  • After minification 1.8 kB
  • After compression 952 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 266 B, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.2 kB or 55% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 656 B

  • Original 98.8 kB
  • After minification 98.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Deacon Lloyd images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1 B

  • Original 40.6 kB
  • After minification 40.6 kB
  • After compression 40.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 25.9 kB
  • After minification 25.9 kB
  • After compression 23.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Deaconlloyd.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (33%)

Requests Now

9

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 9 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Deacon Lloyd. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

deaconlloyd.com

deaconlloyd.com

40 ms

theme.css

theme.css

22 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

9 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

26 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

11 ms

css

css

16 ms

css

css

28 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

15 ms

New_DLA_Logo50.png

New_DLA_Logo50.png

13 ms

Homebg2a.jpg

Homebg2a.jpg

12 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf

11 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

16 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

19 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

17 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

18 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

53 ms

Accessibility Review

deaconlloyd.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

deaconlloyd.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

deaconlloyd.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Deaconlloyd.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Deaconlloyd.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

deaconlloyd.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Deacon Lloyd. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: