Tools & Wizards About Us
deckdetail.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 62

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

deckdetail.com

Michigan Deck Building | Michigan Deck Cleaning, Staining, Sealing

Page Load Speed

433 ms in total

First Response

16 ms

Resources Loaded

247 ms

Page Rendered

170 ms

deckdetail.com screenshot

About Website

Visit deckdetail.com now to see the best up-to-date Deck Detail content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about deckdetail.com

Michigan deck cleaning, deck staining - sealing, power washing services from Michigan deck cleaning company, Deck Detail, serving Plymouth and its the surrounding areas.

Visit deckdetail.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Deckdetail.com page load time and found that the first response time was 16 ms and then it took 417 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

deckdetail.com performance score

62

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

55/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.8 s

84/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value60 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.182

67/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.8 s

79/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

deckdetail.com

16 ms

flexslider.css

15 ms

jquery.fancybox-buttons.css

17 ms

jquery.fancybox-thumbs.css

18 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

17 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Deckdetail.com, 11% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (78 ms) belongs to the original domain Deckdetail.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 280.8 kB (15%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Deckdetail.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 15.9 kB

  • Original 18.8 kB
  • After minification 10.5 kB
  • After compression 2.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.3 kB, which is 44% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.9 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 4.4 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Deck Detail images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 164.1 kB

  • Original 228.9 kB
  • After minification 151.5 kB
  • After compression 64.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 164.1 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 96.4 kB

  • Original 112.4 kB
  • After minification 84.1 kB
  • After compression 16.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Deckdetail.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 96.4 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (45%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

21

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Deck Detail. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

deckdetail.com

deckdetail.com

16 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

15 ms

jquery.fancybox-buttons.css

jquery.fancybox-buttons.css

17 ms

jquery.fancybox-thumbs.css

jquery.fancybox-thumbs.css

18 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

17 ms

slick.css

slick.css

17 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

18 ms

stylesheet.css

stylesheet.css

31 ms

js

js

66 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

28 ms

jquery-ui.js

jquery-ui.js

34 ms

jquery.flexslider.js

jquery.flexslider.js

26 ms

jquery.fancybox.js

jquery.fancybox.js

27 ms

jquery.mousewheel-3.0.6.pack.js

jquery.mousewheel-3.0.6.pack.js

23 ms

jquery.fancybox-buttons.js

jquery.fancybox-buttons.js

24 ms

jquery.fancybox-media.js

jquery.fancybox-media.js

24 ms

jquery.fancybox-thumbs.js

jquery.fancybox-thumbs.js

30 ms

slick.js

slick.js

34 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

30 ms

css

css

54 ms

background.jpg

background.jpg

78 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

4 ms

phone.svg

phone.svg

14 ms

20years.png

20years.png

22 ms

slide-deck.jpg

slide-deck.jpg

34 ms

slide-full.jpg

slide-full.jpg

30 ms

slide-staining.jpg

slide-staining.jpg

33 ms

slide-bw.jpg

slide-bw.jpg

25 ms

slide-sealing.jpg

slide-sealing.jpg

23 ms

slide-out.jpg

slide-out.jpg

45 ms

slide-repairs.jpg

slide-repairs.jpg

44 ms

slide-washing.jpg

slide-washing.jpg

44 ms

Trex2020-white.png

Trex2020-white.png

33 ms

arrow-up-white.png

arrow-up-white.png

36 ms

logo-white.svg

logo-white.svg

41 ms

email.svg

email.svg

40 ms

social-fb.svg

social-fb.svg

43 ms

NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffHjDGItzZg.ttf

NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffHjDGItzZg.ttf

19 ms

NaPecZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7fdMPmCA.ttf

NaPecZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7fdMPmCA.ttf

22 ms

NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffGjEGItzZg.ttf

NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffGjEGItzZg.ttf

26 ms

SlGWmQWMvZQIdix7AFxXmMh3eDs1Yg.ttf

SlGWmQWMvZQIdix7AFxXmMh3eDs1Yg.ttf

27 ms

SlGVmQWMvZQIdix7AFxXkHNSaA.ttf

SlGVmQWMvZQIdix7AFxXkHNSaA.ttf

29 ms

prev.svg

prev.svg

4 ms

next.svg

next.svg

6 ms

flexslider-icon.woff

flexslider-icon.woff

6 ms

Accessibility Review

deckdetail.com accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

deckdetail.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

deckdetail.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Deckdetail.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Deckdetail.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

deckdetail.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Deck Detail. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: