Report Summary

  • 85

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 64

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 30% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    25% of websites

Page Load Speed

4 sec in total

First Response

1 sec

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

354 ms

declicom.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Declicom content for Turkey. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about declicom.com

Visit declicom.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Declicom.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

declicom.com performance score

85

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

42/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

71/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.7 s

86/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.3 s

94/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.wordsecuremail.com

1017 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

260 ms

269 ms

css

26 ms

jwplayer.js

79 ms

Our browser made a total of 124 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Declicom.com, 15% (19 requests) were made to Um.simpli.fi and 3% (4 requests) were made to I.simpli.fi. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Wordsecuremail.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 444.6 kB (49%)

Content Size

914.5 kB

After Optimization

469.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Declicom.com main page is 914.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 483.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 122.3 kB

  • Original 158.4 kB
  • After minification 158.3 kB
  • After compression 36.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 122.3 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 12.5 kB

  • Original 272.1 kB
  • After minification 259.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Declicom images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 309.8 kB

  • Original 483.9 kB
  • After minification 483.9 kB
  • After compression 174.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 309.8 kB or 64% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (41%)

Requests Now

100

After Optimization

59

The browser has sent 100 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Declicom. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

declicom.com accessibility score

64

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

<object> elements do not have [alt] text

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

declicom.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

declicom.com SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    TR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Declicom.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Turkish language. Our system also found out that Declicom.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Declicom. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: