Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

302 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

601 ms

decrescent.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to decrescent.com homepage info - get ready to check Decrescent best content right away, or after learning these important things about decrescent.com

Onogo

Visit decrescent.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Decrescent.com page load time and found that the first response time was 302 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

decrescent.com performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

34/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.3 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.6 s

38/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value350 ms

73/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.3 s

50/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

decrescent.com

302 ms

decrescent.com

437 ms

onogo.com

537 ms

store.onogo.com

479 ms

constants.js

45 ms

Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Decrescent.com, 96% (65 requests) were made to Store.onogo.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Onogo.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (675 ms) relates to the external source Store.onogo.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 218.5 kB (13%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Decrescent.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 215.7 kB

  • Original 254.4 kB
  • After minification 211.3 kB
  • After compression 38.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 43.0 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 215.7 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 117 B

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Decrescent images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 275 B

  • Original 169.7 kB
  • After minification 169.7 kB
  • After compression 169.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 2.4 kB

  • Original 33.0 kB
  • After minification 33.0 kB
  • After compression 30.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Decrescent.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (72%)

Requests Now

64

After Optimization

18

The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Decrescent. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

decrescent.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

decrescent.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

decrescent.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Decrescent.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Decrescent.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Decrescent. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: