8 sec in total
2.6 sec
4.8 sec
579 ms
Welcome to deehutton.com homepage info - get ready to check DEE HUTTON best content right away, or after learning these important things about deehutton.com
An approachable take on the couture process. Customized by you, fit to you and ready within weeks. As seen in Vogue, Town & Country, Brides Magazine & more.
Visit deehutton.comWe analyzed Deehutton.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.6 sec and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
deehutton.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
17/100
10%
Value28.7 s
0/100
25%
Value23.9 s
0/100
10%
Value9,990 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.085
93/100
15%
Value24.4 s
0/100
10%
2644 ms
84 ms
150 ms
149 ms
219 ms
Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (89 requests) were addressed to the original Deehutton.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Deehutton.com.
Page size can be reduced by 169.8 kB (9%)
2.0 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Deehutton.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 136.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 136.8 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. DEE HUTTON images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 3.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 7.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Deehutton.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (72%)
87
24
The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of DEE HUTTON. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 48 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
deehutton.com
2644 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
84 ms
style.min.css
150 ms
style.css
149 ms
spb-styles.css
219 ms
swift-slider.min.css
162 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
151 ms
woocommerce.css
167 ms
style.css
264 ms
bootstrap.min.css
264 ms
font-awesome.min.css
291 ms
v4-shims.min.css
270 ms
main.css
346 ms
sf-woocommerce.css
310 ms
responsive.css
428 ms
style.css
308 ms
css
28 ms
jquery.js
472 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
470 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
505 ms
jquery.viewports.min.js
507 ms
fonts.css
551 ms
modernizr-custom.js
665 ms
spb-functions.min.js
666 ms
swift-slider.min.js
669 ms
jquery.smartresize.min.js
666 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
667 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
668 ms
js.cookie.min.js
669 ms
woocommerce.min.js
670 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
689 ms
prismjs.js
682 ms
greensock.js
682 ms
bootstrap.min.js
688 ms
jquery-ui-1.11.4.custom.min.js
682 ms
lightslider.min.js
681 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
799 ms
jquery.equalHeights.js
799 ms
jquery.ba-throttle-debounce.min.js
747 ms
jquery.infinitescroll.min.js
678 ms
jquery.stickyplugin.js
676 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
677 ms
jquery.transit.min.js
750 ms
jquery.appear.js
759 ms
jquery.auto-grow-input.min.js
652 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
645 ms
ilightbox.min.js
651 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
646 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
840 ms
jquery.easypiechart.min.js
828 ms
jquery.countdown.min.js
797 ms
jquery.countTo.js
708 ms
jquery.dotdotdot.js
663 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
631 ms
jquery.fittext.js
629 ms
analytics.js
196 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.min.js
575 ms
jquery.parallax.min.js
574 ms
jquery.stellar.min.js
460 ms
jquery.stickem.js
460 ms
jquery.timeago.js
458 ms
jquery.viewport.js
459 ms
functions.js
511 ms
wp-embed.min.js
457 ms
forms-api.min.js
458 ms
logo.png
508 ms
Gotham-Light.ttf
553 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
919 ms
si-atelier.woff
549 ms
header1.jpg
922 ms
banditdressslider.jpg
920 ms
deniareed-1.jpg
916 ms
header2.jpg
912 ms
collect
58 ms
bridesmaids-1-e1507784410480.jpg
807 ms
header-5.jpg
805 ms
stephpete-e1507784224433.jpg
807 ms
SHOT_06_076_A.jpg
809 ms
header-4.jpg
811 ms
brand_collage-left.jpg
815 ms
Shot_30_027_SM.jpg
728 ms
separates.jpg
727 ms
gowns.jpg
711 ms
095-2016_Stephanie_Peter_0649-1.jpg
805 ms
Press-Logo2.jpg
805 ms
visit.jpg
674 ms
deehutton.com
443 ms
Screen-Shot-2017-10-11-at-2.40.39-PM.png
184 ms
Screen-Shot-2017-10-11-at-2.38.24-PM.png
285 ms
Screen-Shot-2017-10-11-at-2.39.34-PM.png
283 ms
Gotham.ttf
111 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
83 ms
deehutton.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
deehutton.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
deehutton.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Deehutton.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Deehutton.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
deehutton.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of DEE HUTTON. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: