Tools & Wizards About Us
delightmedia.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 71

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    30% of websites

delightmedia.in

Best website design & Digital marketing Company in vapi, Gujarat, Mumbai, India - Delight Media in vapi gujarat

Page Load Speed

6.6 sec in total

First Response

664 ms

Resources Loaded

5.6 sec

Page Rendered

386 ms

delightmedia.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Delight Media content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about delightmedia.in

We are offering best quality website design & development, mobile apps development, e-commerce development, billing software development, erp/crm solutions, domain registration, web hosting , online p...

Visit delightmedia.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Delightmedia.in page load time and found that the first response time was 664 ms and then it took 6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

delightmedia.in performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

43/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.7 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.1 s

31/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.516

0/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.5 s

71/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

delightmedia.in

664 ms

delightmedia.in

1386 ms

bootstrap.min.css

420 ms

font-awesome.min.css

578 ms

sm-core-css.css

580 ms

Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Delightmedia.in, 22% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Delightmedia.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 548.3 kB (32%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Delightmedia.in main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 30.1 kB

  • Original 36.0 kB
  • After minification 25.0 kB
  • After compression 5.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.0 kB, which is 31% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 464.0 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Delight Media needs image optimization as it can save up to 464.0 kB or 31% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 31.8 kB

  • Original 106.0 kB
  • After minification 106.0 kB
  • After compression 74.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 31.8 kB or 30% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 22.4 kB

  • Original 72.7 kB
  • After minification 72.7 kB
  • After compression 50.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Delightmedia.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 22.4 kB or 31% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (52%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

22

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Delight Media. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

delightmedia.in

delightmedia.in

664 ms

delightmedia.in

delightmedia.in

1386 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

420 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

578 ms

sm-core-css.css

sm-core-css.css

580 ms

sm-clean.css

sm-clean.css

591 ms

fractionslider.css

fractionslider.css

591 ms

style.css

style.css

614 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

628 ms

owl.theme.default.css

owl.theme.default.css

769 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

777 ms

styles.css

styles.css

792 ms

color-blue.css

color-blue.css

789 ms

css

css

31 ms

css

css

47 ms

theme.css

theme.css

1027 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

832 ms

delight-media-logo.png

delight-media-logo.png

958 ms

slide-1.jpg

slide-1.jpg

1760 ms

1.png

1.png

1582 ms

slide-2.jpg

slide-2.jpg

1406 ms

jquery-1.12.4.min.js

jquery-1.12.4.min.js

1181 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1234 ms

jquery.scrollUp.js

jquery.scrollUp.js

1293 ms

jquery.smartmenus.js

jquery.smartmenus.js

1658 ms

jquery.fractionslider.js

jquery.fractionslider.js

1404 ms

jquery.sticky-kit.min.js

jquery.sticky-kit.min.js

1510 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

1596 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

1584 ms

jquery.counterup.min.js

jquery.counterup.min.js

1716 ms

script.js

script.js

1779 ms

w1.png

w1.png

1989 ms

w2.png

w2.png

1884 ms

w4.png

w4.png

2069 ms

online-promotion.png

online-promotion.png

1938 ms

w5.png

w5.png

1988 ms

w6.png

w6.png

1995 ms

seo-process.png

seo-process.png

2201 ms

shaamak.jpg

shaamak.jpg

2539 ms

vrundavan-electrical.jpg

vrundavan-electrical.jpg

2533 ms

natural-agro.jpg

natural-agro.jpg

1751 ms

1.png

1.png

1629 ms

2.png

2.png

1708 ms

3.png

3.png

1777 ms

css

css

19 ms

fs.spinner.gif

fs.spinner.gif

1320 ms

recent-case-studies-bg.jpg

recent-case-studies-bg.jpg

1320 ms

pattern.png

pattern.png

2412 ms

last-news.png

last-news.png

1474 ms

location.png

location.png

1521 ms

recent-posts.png

recent-posts.png

1523 ms

work-time.png

work-time.png

1647 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

158 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

209 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

254 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

256 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

256 ms

fontawesome-webfont5b62.woff

fontawesome-webfont5b62.woff

1560 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

150 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

150 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

149 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

151 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

151 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

152 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

9 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

57 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

57 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf

58 ms

Accessibility Review

delightmedia.in accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

delightmedia.in best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

delightmedia.in SEO score

71

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Delightmedia.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Delightmedia.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

delightmedia.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Delight Media. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: