Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 64

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 29% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

dentax.am

Dentax

Page Load Speed

8.4 sec in total

First Response

30 ms

Resources Loaded

8.1 sec

Page Rendered

274 ms

dentax.am screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Dentax content for Armenia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about dentax.am

Dentax

Visit dentax.am

Key Findings

We analyzed Dentax.am page load time and found that the first response time was 30 ms and then it took 8.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

dentax.am performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

30/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.6 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.8 s

24/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,090 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.076

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.8 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

dentax.am

30 ms

dentax.am

751 ms

bootstrap.css

505 ms

animate.css

426 ms

stylesheet.css

569 ms

Our browser made a total of 105 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (83 requests) were addressed to the original Dentax.am, 6% (6 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Dentax.am.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 170.6 kB (19%)

Content Size

921.1 kB

After Optimization

750.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Dentax.am main page is 921.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 451.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 90.5 kB

  • Original 107.4 kB
  • After minification 107.2 kB
  • After compression 16.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 90.5 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 63.6 kB

  • Original 451.2 kB
  • After minification 387.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Dentax needs image optimization as it can save up to 63.6 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 8.0 kB

  • Original 300.1 kB
  • After minification 300.1 kB
  • After compression 292.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 8.5 kB

  • Original 62.5 kB
  • After minification 60.4 kB
  • After compression 54.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dentax.am needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.5 kB or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (47%)

Requests Now

98

After Optimization

52

The browser has sent 98 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dentax. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

dentax.am accessibility score

64

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

dentax.am best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

dentax.am SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dentax.am can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Dentax.am main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Dentax. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: