Tools & Wizards About Us
dependencytrack.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 76

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

dependencytrack.org

Dependency-Track | Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) Analysis | OWASP

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

92 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

597 ms

dependencytrack.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to dependencytrack.org homepage info - get ready to check Dependency Track best content for Canada right away, or after learning these important things about dependencytrack.org

Dependency-Track is a continuous SBOM analysis platform that allows organizations to identify and reduce risk in the software supply chain. Dependency-Track is open-source and distributed under the Ap...

Visit dependencytrack.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Dependencytrack.org page load time and found that the first response time was 92 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

dependencytrack.org performance score

76

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

72/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

42/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.4 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

87/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.1 s

75/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

dependencytrack.org

92 ms

bootstrap.min.css

54 ms

animate.min.css

61 ms

fontawesome-all.min.css

64 ms

font-mfizz.css

180 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Dependencytrack.org, 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (788 ms) belongs to the original domain Dependencytrack.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 194.6 kB (20%)

Content Size

975.6 kB

After Optimization

781.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Dependencytrack.org main page is 975.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 873.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 33.0 kB

  • Original 39.3 kB
  • After minification 30.0 kB
  • After compression 6.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.4 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.0 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 159.2 kB

  • Original 873.1 kB
  • After minification 714.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Dependency Track needs image optimization as it can save up to 159.2 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 2.4 kB

  • Original 63.1 kB
  • After minification 63.1 kB
  • After compression 60.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (36%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

32

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dependency Track. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

dependencytrack.org

dependencytrack.org

92 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

54 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

61 ms

fontawesome-all.min.css

fontawesome-all.min.css

64 ms

font-mfizz.css

font-mfizz.css

180 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

99 ms

slick.css

slick.css

184 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

101 ms

offcanvas-menu.css

offcanvas-menu.css

120 ms

style.css

style.css

103 ms

js

js

66 ms

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

118 ms

jquery.inview.min.js

jquery.inview.min.js

143 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

142 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

174 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

173 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

302 ms

lightbox.js

lightbox.js

303 ms

script.js

script.js

308 ms

css

css

31 ms

css

css

43 ms

dt-logo-white-text.svg

dt-logo-white-text.svg

135 ms

logo-owasp-small.svg

logo-owasp-small.svg

211 ms

dt-logo.svg

dt-logo.svg

199 ms

background.svg

background.svg

128 ms

dashboard-small-monitor-shadow.png

dashboard-small-monitor-shadow.png

153 ms

continuous-integration.svg

continuous-integration.svg

126 ms

continuous-visibility.svg

continuous-visibility.svg

172 ms

continuous-transparency.svg

continuous-transparency.svg

175 ms

component-inventory.png

component-inventory.png

298 ms

findings.png

findings.png

169 ms

policy-violations.png

policy-violations.png

216 ms

logo-owasp.svg

logo-owasp.svg

213 ms

logo-threadfix.svg

logo-threadfix.svg

193 ms

logo-rbs.svg

logo-rbs.svg

262 ms

logo-jenkins.svg

logo-jenkins.svg

349 ms

logo-codedx.svg

logo-codedx.svg

788 ms

logo-sonatype-ossindex.svg

logo-sonatype-ossindex.svg

248 ms

logo-slack.svg

logo-slack.svg

376 ms

logo-nvd.svg

logo-nvd.svg

314 ms

logo-npm.svg

logo-npm.svg

306 ms

logo-snyk.svg

logo-snyk.svg

344 ms

logo-github.svg

logo-github.svg

346 ms

logo-osv.svg

logo-osv.svg

360 ms

logo-kenna.svg

logo-kenna.svg

370 ms

logo-fortify.svg

logo-fortify.svg

394 ms

logo-jira.svg

logo-jira.svg

546 ms

logo-teams.svg

logo-teams.svg

397 ms

logo-defect-dojo.svg

logo-defect-dojo.svg

432 ms

logo-security-compass.svg

logo-security-compass.svg

413 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff

133 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff

91 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff

92 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff

92 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

540 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

514 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

540 ms

font-mfizz.svg

font-mfizz.svg

448 ms

font-mfizz.woff

font-mfizz.woff

505 ms

icons.ttf

icons.ttf

626 ms

Accessibility Review

dependencytrack.org accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

dependencytrack.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

dependencytrack.org SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dependencytrack.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Dependencytrack.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

dependencytrack.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Dependency Track. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: