Access depot-konto-vergleich.de. DEPOT KONTO VERGLEICH 20❷3 » Kosten

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.9 s

7/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.6 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,150 ms

22/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.022

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.4 s

15/100

10%

depot-konto-vergleich.de

351 ms

www.depot-konto-vergleich.de

1307 ms

js

72 ms

sparplanrechner.js

212 ms

jquery-2.2.4.min.js

25 ms

Our browser made a total of 105 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (90 requests) were addressed to the original Depot-konto-vergleich.de, 6% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Js.financeads.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Depot-konto-vergleich.de.

Content Size

850.7 kB

After Optimization

722.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Depot-konto-vergleich.de main page is 850.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 292.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 108.6 kB

Original 136.0 kB
After minification 131.5 kB
After compression 27.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 108.6 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 7.5 kB

Original 225.6 kB
After minification 218.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. DEPOT KONTO VERGLEICH images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.5 kB

Original 292.5 kB
After minification 292.5 kB
After compression 290.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 10.1 kB

Original 196.6 kB
After minification 196.6 kB
After compression 186.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Depot-konto-vergleich.de has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 96 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of DEPOT KONTO VERGLEICH. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Serves images with low resolution

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

Search Engine Optimization Advices

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

High

Links are not crawlable

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

DE
Language Claimed

DE
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Depot-konto-vergleich.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Depot-konto-vergleich.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

depot-konto-vergleich.de

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of DEPOT KONTO VERGLEICH. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

DEPOT KONTO VERGLEICH 20❷3 » Kosten » Wertpapierdepot

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Network Requests Diagram

depot-konto-vergleich.de

www.depot-konto-vergleich.de

js

sparplanrechner.js

jquery-2.2.4.min.js

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Content Size

After Optimization

HTML Optimization

Image Optimization

JavaScript Optimization

CSS Optimization

Requests Breakdown

Requests Now

After Optimization

Network Requests Diagram

depot-konto-vergleich.de

www.depot-konto-vergleich.de

js

sparplanrechner.js

jquery-2.2.4.min.js

bootstrap.css

fa_style.css

style.min.css

classic-themes.min.css

yasr.css

screen.min.css

widget-options.css

wpk_p684593.css

jquery.rateyo.min.css

style.css

adaptive.css

retina.css

ilightbox.css

dark-skin.css

jquery.isotope.css

finance-business.css

fontello.css

animate.css

css

tablepress-combined.min.css

tablepress-responsive.min.css

yasr-table-light.css

jquery.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery.rateyo.min.js

wpk_p684593.js

jsLibraries.min.js

jquery.iLightBox.min.js

fa_style_widget.css

jquery-1.10.2.min.js.gz

jquery.fa_qtip.css.gz

jquery.fa_qtip.css

fa_style_responsive.css

bootstrap_wp.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

jquery.megaMenu.js