Tools & Wizards About Us
depot-vergleich.at screenshot

Report Summary

  • 70

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 49

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 20% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

depot-vergleich.at

Depotvergleich Österreich 2019 - Bestes Depot & beste Depotbank

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

652 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

213 ms

depot-vergleich.at screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Depotvergleich content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about depot-vergleich.at

Kostenloser Depotvergleich für 2019. Bestes Depotkonto für Österreich, welches ist das? Verschiedene Depots hier im Überblick.

Visit depot-vergleich.at

Key Findings

We analyzed Depot-vergleich.at page load time and found that the first response time was 652 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

depot-vergleich.at performance score

70

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

93/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

55/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

73/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value360 ms

72/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.069

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.8 s

35/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

depot-vergleich.at

652 ms

style.css

192 ms

boxOver.js

192 ms

iframeResizeMe.min.js.gz

331 ms

show_ads.js

69 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 18% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Depot-vergleich.at, 23% (14 requests) were made to Js.financeads.net and 15% (9 requests) were made to Bilder.financeads.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Developers.google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 78.5 kB (10%)

Content Size

804.3 kB

After Optimization

725.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Depot-vergleich.at main page is 804.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 542.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 21.1 kB

  • Original 29.6 kB
  • After minification 28.7 kB
  • After compression 8.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.1 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 14.0 kB

  • Original 223.0 kB
  • After minification 209.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Depotvergleich images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 43.1 kB

  • Original 542.1 kB
  • After minification 542.1 kB
  • After compression 499.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 305 B

  • Original 9.6 kB
  • After minification 9.6 kB
  • After compression 9.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Depot-vergleich.at has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (50%)

Requests Now

54

After Optimization

27

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Depotvergleich. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

depot-vergleich.at

depot-vergleich.at

652 ms

style.css

style.css

192 ms

boxOver.js

boxOver.js

192 ms

iframeResizeMe.min.js.gz

iframeResizeMe.min.js.gz

331 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

69 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

20 ms

counter.php

counter.php

67 ms

counter.php

counter.php

39 ms

depotrechner.php

depotrechner.php

413 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

383 ms

header_bg.jpg

header_bg.jpg

380 ms

menu_title_bg.gif

menu_title_bg.gif

96 ms

checked.png

checked.png

191 ms

bar_bg.gif

bar_bg.gif

191 ms

Fotolia_28987199_XS.png

Fotolia_28987199_XS.png

680 ms

vorteile.png

vorteile.png

287 ms

csscreme.jpg

csscreme.jpg

286 ms

all.js

all.js

13 ms

all.js

all.js

5 ms

iframeResizeMe.min.js.gz

iframeResizeMe.min.js.gz

417 ms

bootstrap_ifrm.css

bootstrap_ifrm.css

102 ms

fa_style.php

fa_style.php

107 ms

4712.png

4712.png

580 ms

jquery-1.10.2.min.js

jquery-1.10.2.min.js

206 ms

jquery.fa_qtip.css.gz

jquery.fa_qtip.css.gz

270 ms

jquery.fa_qtip2.js

jquery.fa_qtip2.js

473 ms

fa_starrating_layer2.js

fa_starrating_layer2.js

381 ms

fa_star-rating.js.gz

fa_star-rating.js.gz

383 ms

bootstrap_new.min.js.gz

bootstrap_new.min.js.gz

380 ms

boxover.js

boxover.js

382 ms

iframeResizer.contentWindow.min.js.gz

iframeResizer.contentWindow.min.js.gz

381 ms

popover.js.gz

popover.js.gz

482 ms

4398.png

4398.png

577 ms

338.png

338.png

578 ms

3338.png

3338.png

578 ms

633.png

633.png

579 ms

2207.png

2207.png

580 ms

339.png

339.png

679 ms

340.png

340.png

680 ms

341.png

341.png

680 ms

bootstrap_ifrm.css

bootstrap_ifrm.css

384 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

129 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

55 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

13 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

31 ms

fastbutton

fastbutton

28 ms

ga.js

ga.js

40 ms

like.php

like.php

96 ms

postmessageRelay

postmessageRelay

136 ms

jquery-1.10.2.min.js

jquery-1.10.2.min.js

300 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

98 ms

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

213 ms

WJ6af6jIgrp.css

WJ6af6jIgrp.css

58 ms

developers.google.com

developers.google.com

1037 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

402 ms

3604799710-postmessagerelay.js

3604799710-postmessagerelay.js

20 ms

rpc:shindig_random.js

rpc:shindig_random.js

9 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

7 ms

settings

settings

109 ms

button.856debeac157d9669cf51e73a08fbc93.js

button.856debeac157d9669cf51e73a08fbc93.js

22 ms

embeds

embeds

97 ms

tweet_button.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.de.html

tweet_button.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.de.html

29 ms

Accessibility Review

depot-vergleich.at accessibility score

49

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

depot-vergleich.at best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

depot-vergleich.at SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1252

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Depot-vergleich.at can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Depot-vergleich.at main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

depot-vergleich.at

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Depotvergleich. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: