6 sec in total
519 ms
5 sec
461 ms
Click here to check amazing Deratisation content for France. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about deratisation.com
Vous avez un problème de rats, souris, punaise de lit ou autres insectes ? Contactez un professionnel agréé par le Ministère pour en venir à bout
Visit deratisation.comWe analyzed Deratisation.com page load time and found that the first response time was 519 ms and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
deratisation.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.3 s
7/100
10%
Value14.2 s
0/100
25%
Value10.3 s
8/100
10%
Value1,220 ms
20/100
30%
Value0.008
100/100
15%
Value10.0 s
26/100
10%
519 ms
320 ms
240 ms
361 ms
1450 ms
Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Deratisation.com, 17% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Deratisation.com.
Page size can be reduced by 52.7 kB (4%)
1.3 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Deratisation.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 970.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 41.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.3 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Deratisation images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 251 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 351 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Deratisation.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (46%)
13
7
The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Deratisation. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.deratisation.com
519 ms
autoptimize_fb87790f629357e29bca59ca4875615c.css
320 ms
autoptimize_5a15e6615d80bd77ce9518c0d19a7d42.css
240 ms
jquery.min.js
361 ms
headerScript.min.js'%20async='async
1450 ms
css
50 ms
tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js
29 ms
platform.js
61 ms
autoptimize_c293ac4ed88ca6bce958629a44b9cc49.js
417 ms
analytics.js
111 ms
gtm.js
175 ms
istockphoto-1226430458-612x612-1-1.jpg
280 ms
equipe-parasystem-anti-nuisibles.jpg
567 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf
39 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf
61 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf
64 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf
65 ms
LANENAR_-webfont.woff
106 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
105 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
274 ms
iconfont.ttf
181 ms
collect
39 ms
js
66 ms
deratisation.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
deratisation.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
deratisation.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
FR
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Deratisation.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Deratisation.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
deratisation.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Deratisation. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: