8.8 sec in total
1.3 sec
7.3 sec
158 ms
Click here to check amazing Desiflix content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about desiflix.in
Visit desiflix.inWe analyzed Desiflix.in page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 7.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
desiflix.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
53/100
10%
Value2.9 s
80/100
25%
Value4.0 s
81/100
10%
Value110 ms
97/100
30%
Value0.577
12/100
15%
Value3.7 s
90/100
10%
1316 ms
127 ms
145 ms
160 ms
168 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Desiflix.in, 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Desiflix.in.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (35%)
3.1 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Desiflix.in main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 70.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.9 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.2 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 486.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Desiflix needs image optimization as it can save up to 486.9 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 304.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 304.7 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 244.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Desiflix.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 244.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (69%)
72
22
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Desiflix. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
desiflix.in
1316 ms
wp-customer-reviews.css
127 ms
facebook-btn.css
145 ms
google-btn.css
160 ms
style.css
168 ms
postratings-css.css
167 ms
css
26 ms
style.css
296 ms
ytprefs.min.css
217 ms
ldc-lite.css
246 ms
jquery.js
389 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
254 ms
wp-customer-reviews.js
229 ms
ajax-product-script.js
295 ms
ytprefs.min.js
302 ms
buttons.js
9 ms
style.css
4500 ms
footer.css
325 ms
css
32 ms
css
39 ms
css
40 ms
smoothDivScroll.css
363 ms
scrolling_content.css
347 ms
bootstrap.min.css
500 ms
jquerysctipttop.css
7 ms
smk-accordion.css
417 ms
font-awesome.css
426 ms
font-awesome.min.css
432 ms
jquery.min.js
31 ms
nicescroll.js
121 ms
css
14 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.min.js
411 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
352 ms
jquery.kinetic.min.js
363 ms
jquery.smoothdivscroll-1.3-min.js
386 ms
smk-accordion.js
400 ms
lightGallery.js
453 ms
bootstrap.min.js
427 ms
postratings-js.js
444 ms
navigation.js
5310 ms
fitvids.min.js
479 ms
bootstrap-hover-dropdown.js
497 ms
iframe_api
28 ms
www-widgetapi.js
7 ms
arrow_footer.png
30 ms
social_icons.png
26 ms
insert-pic.jpg
85 ms
logo35.png
99 ms
search.png
76 ms
Nannaku-Prematho1.jpg
174 ms
Sardar-Gabbar-Singh.png
781 ms
Srimanthudu.jpg
460 ms
Dictator.jpg
738 ms
arrow_left.png
171 ms
arrow_right.png
240 ms
logo_black.png
243 ms
scrolltotop.png
306 ms
loading_product.gif
379 ms
rating_over.gif
360 ms
HqHm7BVC_nzzTui2lzQTDaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
5 ms
Y_TKV6o8WovbUd3m_X9aAA.ttf
12 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
13 ms
Jzo62I39jc0gQRrbndN6nfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
13 ms
12038011_1069293793082091_3507497439035224205_n.jpg
17 ms
getAllAppDefault.esi
88 ms
getSegment.php
157 ms
checkOAuth.esi
5 ms
t.dhj
49 ms
t.dhj
35 ms
cm
24 ms
x35248
107 ms
s-3271.xgi
8 ms
hbpix
34 ms
7 ms
10 ms
pixel
19 ms
pixel
18 ms
xrefid.xgi
7 ms
2981
21 ms
big_transparent.gif
75 ms
cursor_arrow_left.png
80 ms
cursor_arrow_left.cur
73 ms
cursor_arrow_right.png
70 ms
cursor_arrow_right.cur
78 ms
desiflix.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
desiflix.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
desiflix.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Desiflix.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Desiflix.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
desiflix.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Desiflix. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: