Tools & Wizards About Us
designaddict.us screenshot

Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

designaddict.us

Find the best Interior designers and decorators in Pune

Page Load Speed

5.4 sec in total

First Response

817 ms

Resources Loaded

4 sec

Page Rendered

606 ms

designaddict.us screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Designaddict content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about designaddict.us

Leading Interior Designers In Pune Who Offers End-To-End Home Interior Design Solutions With 300+ Home Interiors Delivered In Pune. Get Free estimate and design layout

Visit designaddict.us

Key Findings

We analyzed Designaddict.us page load time and found that the first response time was 817 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

designaddict.us performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.3 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.6 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value60 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.8 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

designaddict.us

817 ms

js

59 ms

givecss.php

570 ms

style.css

389 ms

jquery.js

486 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Designaddict.us, 10% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 10% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Designaddict.us.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 259.3 kB (12%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Designaddict.us main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 92.6 kB

  • Original 103.8 kB
  • After minification 102.6 kB
  • After compression 11.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 92.6 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 79.5 kB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Designaddict images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 65.1 kB

  • Original 101.0 kB
  • After minification 101.0 kB
  • After compression 35.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 65.1 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 22.1 kB

  • Original 26.7 kB
  • After minification 21.1 kB
  • After compression 4.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Designaddict.us needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 22.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (47%)

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Designaddict. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

designaddict.us

designaddict.us

817 ms

js

js

59 ms

givecss.php

givecss.php

570 ms

style.css

style.css

389 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

486 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

296 ms

givejs.php

givejs.php

767 ms

css

css

33 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

106 ms

css2

css2

19 ms

DSC_0128.jpg

DSC_0128.jpg

296 ms

logo-alt.png

logo-alt.png

191 ms

best-interior-designer-pune.jpg

best-interior-designer-pune.jpg

2055 ms

default-image.png

default-image.png

101 ms

about-bg2.jpg

about-bg2.jpg

289 ms

logo.png

logo.png

101 ms

font

font

15 ms

font

font

102 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

149 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

247 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

239 ms

Accessibility Review

designaddict.us accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

designaddict.us best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

designaddict.us SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Designaddict.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Designaddict.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

designaddict.us

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Designaddict. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: