8.7 sec in total
2.2 sec
6.3 sec
195 ms
Click here to check amazing Design By Detail content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about designbydetail.co.uk
Design by Detail are the professional experts in Car Detailing Surrey. As vehicle appearance specialists we offer a wide range of detailing services.
Visit designbydetail.co.ukWe analyzed Designbydetail.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 2.2 sec and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
designbydetail.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value15.6 s
0/100
10%
Value33.7 s
0/100
25%
Value22.3 s
0/100
10%
Value480 ms
60/100
30%
Value0.054
98/100
15%
Value31.6 s
0/100
10%
2249 ms
168 ms
354 ms
179 ms
238 ms
Our browser made a total of 149 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (132 requests) were addressed to the original Designbydetail.co.uk, 10% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Designbydetail.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 2.8 MB (59%)
4.7 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Designbydetail.co.uk main page is 4.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 39.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 388 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Design By Detail images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.3 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.4 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Designbydetail.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.4 MB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 127 (95%)
133
6
The browser has sent 133 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Design By Detail. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 104 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
2249 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
168 ms
style.min.css
354 ms
styles.css
179 ms
settings.css
238 ms
superfish.css
180 ms
style.css
181 ms
event_template.css
227 ms
responsive.css
250 ms
css
34 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
240 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
241 ms
style.css
286 ms
font-awesome.min.css
356 ms
style.min.css
357 ms
style.css
539 ms
dripicons.css
320 ms
stylesheet.min.css
1238 ms
print.css
382 ms
timetable-schedule.min.css
409 ms
timetable-schedule-responsive.min.css
414 ms
style_dynamic.css
475 ms
responsive.min.css
682 ms
style_dynamic_responsive.css
469 ms
js_composer.min.css
1065 ms
css
42 ms
default.min.css
527 ms
jquery.min.js
712 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
586 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
776 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
762 ms
scripts.js
748 ms
eu-cookie-law.js
797 ms
core.min.js
808 ms
tabs.min.js
811 ms
jquery.ba-bbq.min.js
855 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1-packed.js
926 ms
timetable.js
795 ms
accordion.min.js
776 ms
menu.min.js
783 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
940 ms
dom-ready.min.js
834 ms
hooks.min.js
795 ms
i18n.min.js
846 ms
a11y.min.js
845 ms
autocomplete.min.js
887 ms
controlgroup.min.js
886 ms
checkboxradio.min.js
856 ms
button.min.js
857 ms
datepicker.min.js
834 ms
mouse.min.js
838 ms
resizable.min.js
843 ms
draggable.min.js
856 ms
dialog.min.js
908 ms
droppable.min.js
904 ms
progressbar.min.js
850 ms
selectable.min.js
843 ms
sortable.min.js
792 ms
slider.min.js
781 ms
spinner.min.js
734 ms
tooltip.min.js
696 ms
effect.min.js
669 ms
effect-blind.min.js
619 ms
effect-bounce.min.js
609 ms
effect-clip.min.js
606 ms
effect-drop.min.js
561 ms
effect-explode.min.js
581 ms
effect-fade.min.js
579 ms
effect-fold.min.js
546 ms
effect-highlight.min.js
558 ms
effect-pulsate.min.js
515 ms
effect-size.min.js
522 ms
effect-scale.min.js
516 ms
effect-shake.min.js
471 ms
effect-slide.min.js
473 ms
effect-transfer.min.js
420 ms
doubletaptogo.js
452 ms
modernizr.min.js
453 ms
jquery.appear.js
427 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
426 ms
counter.js
429 ms
easypiechart.js
454 ms
mixitup.js
418 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
418 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
420 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
423 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
521 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
337 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
338 ms
infinitescroll.min.js
345 ms
jquery.waitforimages.js
353 ms
jquery.form.min.js
363 ms
waypoints.min.js
394 ms
jplayer.min.js
394 ms
bootstrap.carousel.js
343 ms
skrollr.js
351 ms
Chart.min.js
360 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
391 ms
abstractBaseClass.js
392 ms
jquery.countdown.js
398 ms
6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qNq7jujVj9w.woff
36 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwmRdo3cOWxw.woff
40 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i94_wmRdo3cOWxw.woff
42 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwmRdo3cOWxw.woff
41 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwmRdo3cOWxw.woff
41 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3iu4nwmRdo3cOWxw.woff
42 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aXx-p7K4GLs.woff
42 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w3aXx-p7K4GLs.woff
43 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w3aXx-p7K4GLs.woff
44 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w3aXx-p7K4GLs.woff
45 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aXx-p7K4GLs.woff
44 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aXx-p7K4GLs.woff
45 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw3aXx-p7K4GLs.woff
46 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw3aXx-p7K4GLs.woff
68 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw3aXx-p7K4GLs.woff
68 ms
jquery.multiscroll.min.js
405 ms
jquery.justifiedGallery.min.js
388 ms
bigtext.js
418 ms
jquery.sticky-kit.min.js
406 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
386 ms
typed.js
393 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.min.js
448 ms
lemmon-slider.min.js
413 ms
jquery.fullPage.min.js
471 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
402 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
400 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
436 ms
packery-mode.pkgd.min.js
413 ms
jquery.stretch.js
410 ms
imagesloaded.js
409 ms
rangeslider.min.js
421 ms
jquery.event.move.js
414 ms
1536 ms
jquery.twentytwenty.js
420 ms
default_dynamic.js
417 ms
default.min.js
744 ms
comment-reply.min.js
422 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
413 ms
qode-like.min.js
420 ms
wp-embed.min.js
417 ms
wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js
434 ms
wp-polyfill-dom-rect.min.js
443 ms
wp-polyfill-url.min.js
540 ms
wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js
425 ms
wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js
443 ms
wp-polyfill-object-fit.min.js
453 ms
design-by-detail-about.jpg
457 ms
home2.png
1293 ms
close.png
60 ms
designbydetail.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
designbydetail.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
designbydetail.co.uk SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Designbydetail.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Designbydetail.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
designbydetail.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Design By Detail. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: