Tools & Wizards About Us
designdesign.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 56

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

designdesign.com

Design Design Communications, Inc. | Chicago Area Graphic Design & Web

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

144 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

57 ms

designdesign.com screenshot

About Website

Visit designdesign.com now to see the best up-to-date Design content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about designdesign.com

Award-winning Chicago Web design, branding, logo design, print, environmental design, illustration, event support marketing, graphic design, email marketing, illustration, social media marketing. Full...

Visit designdesign.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Designdesign.com page load time and found that the first response time was 144 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

designdesign.com performance score

56

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

68/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.9 s

6/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.5 s

88/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value330 ms

76/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.3 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.designdesign.com

144 ms

minified.js

44 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

40 ms

polyfill.min.js

923 ms

thunderbolt-commons.09398ec1.bundle.min.js

61 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Designdesign.com, 36% (18 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 32% (16 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (923 ms) relates to the external source Polyfill-fastly.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 699.3 kB (59%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

490.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Designdesign.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 554.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 433.2 kB

  • Original 554.3 kB
  • After minification 552.5 kB
  • After compression 121.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 433.2 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 39.3 kB

  • Original 149.7 kB
  • After minification 110.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Design needs image optimization as it can save up to 39.3 kB or 26% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-47%

Potential reduce by 226.8 kB

  • Original 485.8 kB
  • After minification 485.8 kB
  • After compression 259.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 226.8 kB or 47% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (33%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

20

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Design. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.designdesign.com

www.designdesign.com

144 ms

minified.js

minified.js

44 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

40 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

923 ms

thunderbolt-commons.09398ec1.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.09398ec1.bundle.min.js

61 ms

main.e5a43201.bundle.min.js

main.e5a43201.bundle.min.js

62 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

31 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

61 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

60 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

61 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

61 ms

Dayton_Ogden.png

Dayton_Ogden.png

208 ms

316308_f0ec7253267546beaadd8be092f1322b~mv2.png

316308_f0ec7253267546beaadd8be092f1322b~mv2.png

407 ms

316308_2370d8169d474647a3e87194f49b4c5e~mv2.jpeg

316308_2370d8169d474647a3e87194f49b4c5e~mv2.jpeg

435 ms

316308_8580be24bf224f88bc15d57f253b451b~mv2.jpg

316308_8580be24bf224f88bc15d57f253b451b~mv2.jpg

412 ms

316308_baaaa731b9c24d0db2a70fe6a9ba852e~mv2.jpg

316308_baaaa731b9c24d0db2a70fe6a9ba852e~mv2.jpg

354 ms

316308_76f270fd4c834bc08990ac9744787fb7~mv2.jpg

316308_76f270fd4c834bc08990ac9744787fb7~mv2.jpg

392 ms

316308_962b118b5b384e4996096c81b0b65c2b~mv2.png

316308_962b118b5b384e4996096c81b0b65c2b~mv2.png

454 ms

316308_caa573645a504ffeb8e57bf159f13021.jpg

316308_caa573645a504ffeb8e57bf159f13021.jpg

655 ms

Industry_Canvas_Logo_Shingle.png

Industry_Canvas_Logo_Shingle.png

613 ms

316308_75dd2165a165475bb70b320aac5155b8~mv2.jpg

316308_75dd2165a165475bb70b320aac5155b8~mv2.jpg

688 ms

316308_bc3e406a144d4fee8ca8410d827613b5~mv2.jpg

316308_bc3e406a144d4fee8ca8410d827613b5~mv2.jpg

642 ms

316308_451a716d60014b0382853b4768191c65~mv2_d_2736_3600_s_4_2.jpg

316308_451a716d60014b0382853b4768191c65~mv2_d_2736_3600_s_4_2.jpg

735 ms

316308_d533b533a17b4ec9bac7998da98c3531.jpg

316308_d533b533a17b4ec9bac7998da98c3531.jpg

697 ms

316308_4b616c80d4554366bf96ed4cb5e4c43a.png

316308_4b616c80d4554366bf96ed4cb5e4c43a.png

844 ms

tiny_arrows.4355fe50.png

tiny_arrows.4355fe50.png

70 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

44 ms

file.woff

file.woff

608 ms

file.woff

file.woff

637 ms

file.woff

file.woff

657 ms

opensans-regular-webfont.woff

opensans-regular-webfont.woff

53 ms

opensans-bold-webfont.woff

opensans-bold-webfont.woff

39 ms

388ef902-2c31-4818-abb1-a40dcd81f6d6.woff

388ef902-2c31-4818-abb1-a40dcd81f6d6.woff

34 ms

file.woff

file.woff

566 ms

95 ms

96 ms

95 ms

95 ms

101 ms

100 ms

134 ms

131 ms

129 ms

130 ms

137 ms

134 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

6 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

24 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

5 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

6 ms

Accessibility Review

designdesign.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

designdesign.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

designdesign.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Designdesign.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Designdesign.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

designdesign.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Design. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: