731 ms in total
75 ms
582 ms
74 ms
Visit designerfeed.me now to see the best up-to-date Designerfeed content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about designerfeed.me
Discover best in design industry studios, agencies, and designers. Stay inspired with latest projects updating automatically from top online portfolios.
Visit designerfeed.meWe analyzed Designerfeed.me page load time and found that the first response time was 75 ms and then it took 656 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
designerfeed.me performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.3 s
98/100
10%
Value6.4 s
9/100
25%
Value4.2 s
77/100
10%
Value820 ms
35/100
30%
Value0.524
15/100
15%
Value6.6 s
57/100
10%
75 ms
64 ms
58 ms
165 ms
223 ms
Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Designerfeed.me, 14% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 14% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (228 ms) belongs to the original domain Designerfeed.me.
Page size can be reduced by 7.5 kB (24%)
30.7 kB
23.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Designerfeed.me main page is 30.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 21.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 7.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.0 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.4 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Designerfeed images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 50 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (55%)
11
5
The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Designerfeed. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
designerfeed.me
75 ms
js
64 ms
beacon.min.js
58 ms
normalize.min.css
165 ms
designerfeed.min.css
223 ms
jquery-3.6.0.min.js
204 ms
lazysizes.min.js
85 ms
designerfeed.obf.js
104 ms
1x1.png
216 ms
js
66 ms
analytics.js
24 ms
collect
34 ms
iAWriterDuospace-Regular.woff
221 ms
WremenaLight.woff
228 ms
designerfeed.me accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
designerfeed.me best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
designerfeed.me SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Designerfeed.me can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Designerfeed.me main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
designerfeed.me
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Designerfeed. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: