Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

Page Load Speed

935 ms in total

First Response

181 ms

Resources Loaded

619 ms

Page Rendered

135 ms

designerline.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Designerline content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about designerline.com

From wall feature to functional washing line - easy to install - retractable wall mounted washing line - for indoor & outdoor use.

Visit designerline.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Designerline.com page load time and found that the first response time was 181 ms and then it took 754 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

designerline.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

designerline.com

181 ms

style.css

26 ms

modernizr-2.6.2.min.js

20 ms

jquery-1.9.min.js

51 ms

pixelunion-options-select.js

23 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Designerline.com, 45% (14 requests) were made to Cdn.shopify.com and 10% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (181 ms) belongs to the original domain Designerline.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 388.6 kB (60%)

Content Size

645.2 kB

After Optimization

256.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Designerline.com main page is 645.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 394.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 27.9 kB

  • Original 36.7 kB
  • After minification 30.6 kB
  • After compression 8.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.1 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.9 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 9.6 kB

  • Original 68.2 kB
  • After minification 58.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Designerline needs image optimization as it can save up to 9.6 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 229.7 kB

  • Original 394.2 kB
  • After minification 391.4 kB
  • After compression 164.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 229.7 kB or 58% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 121.4 kB

  • Original 146.0 kB
  • After minification 131.2 kB
  • After compression 24.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Designerline.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 121.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (64%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

10

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Designerline. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

designerline.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF–8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Designerline.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Designerline.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf–8. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Designerline. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: