3.9 sec in total
120 ms
2.8 sec
956 ms
Visit designfavoritter.dk now to see the best up-to-date Designfavoritter content for Denmark and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about designfavoritter.dk
Alt om design
Visit designfavoritter.dkWe analyzed Designfavoritter.dk page load time and found that the first response time was 120 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
designfavoritter.dk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
65/100
10%
Value3.9 s
53/100
25%
Value15.5 s
0/100
10%
Value50 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value4.1 s
86/100
10%
120 ms
823 ms
339 ms
33 ms
326 ms
Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Designfavoritter.dk, 11% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Designfavoritter.dk.
Page size can be reduced by 61.0 kB (8%)
726.8 kB
665.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Designfavoritter.dk main page is 726.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 555.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 55.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 333 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Designfavoritter images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 659 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 4.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Designfavoritter.dk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.9 kB or 12% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (50%)
28
14
The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Designfavoritter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
designfavoritter.dk
120 ms
designfavoritter.dk
823 ms
style.min.css
339 ms
css
33 ms
normalize.css
326 ms
style.css
336 ms
style.css
334 ms
font-awesome.min.css
338 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
334 ms
responsive.css
567 ms
slicknav.css
648 ms
jquery.min.js
663 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
660 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
658 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
749 ms
burnhambox.js
887 ms
jquery.slicknav.min.js
968 ms
e1369c439506b76d9d4ea4a6a6441af7
76 ms
pexels-photo-358636.jpeg
482 ms
pexels-photo-3760067-4.jpeg
382 ms
pexels-photo-699122-1.jpeg
382 ms
pexels-photo-416024.jpeg
381 ms
pexels-photo-2604843.jpeg
517 ms
pexels-photo-784633.jpeg
598 ms
pexels-photo-376464.jpeg
713 ms
cleaning-washing-cleanup-the-ilo-48889.jpeg
708 ms
pexels-photo-3760067-3.jpeg
711 ms
pexels-photo-920382.jpeg
804 ms
analytics.js
23 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrc.woff
29 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrc.woff
30 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrc.woff
37 ms
u-4k0rCzjgs5J7oXnJcM_0kACGMtT-DfrQ.woff
36 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1091 ms
167 ms
designfavoritter.dk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
designfavoritter.dk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
designfavoritter.dk SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DA
DA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Designfavoritter.dk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Danish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Designfavoritter.dk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
designfavoritter.dk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Designfavoritter. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: