Tools & Wizards About Us
designforsite.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

designforsite.com

Design ForSite – Designed to Mean Business | San Jose Web Design & Beyond

Page Load Speed

4.4 sec in total

First Response

293 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

2 sec

designforsite.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Design For Site content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about designforsite.com

San Jose web design company delivering you professional, mobile-ready website design, WordPress, and social media marketing. Contact us today!

Visit designforsite.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Designforsite.com page load time and found that the first response time was 293 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

designforsite.com performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

16/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value47.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.9 s

23/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value120 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.25

50/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.8 s

36/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

designforsite.com

293 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

110 ms

style.css

124 ms

styles.css

127 ms

pushlabs-vidbg.css

121 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Designforsite.com, 13% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Designforsite.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 807.5 kB (4%)

Content Size

21.5 MB

After Optimization

20.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Designforsite.com main page is 21.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 21.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 19.4 kB

  • Original 27.6 kB
  • After minification 27.5 kB
  • After compression 8.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.4 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 778.7 kB

  • Original 21.2 MB
  • After minification 20.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Design For Site images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 4.1 kB

  • Original 175.6 kB
  • After minification 175.2 kB
  • After compression 171.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 5.4 kB

  • Original 48.8 kB
  • After minification 48.8 kB
  • After compression 43.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Designforsite.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.4 kB or 11% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (84%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Design For Site. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

designforsite.com

designforsite.com

293 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

110 ms

style.css

style.css

124 ms

styles.css

styles.css

127 ms

pushlabs-vidbg.css

pushlabs-vidbg.css

121 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

127 ms

css

css

20 ms

ionicons.min.css

ionicons.min.css

40 ms

style-front.css

style-front.css

121 ms

style.css

style.css

165 ms

style.css

style.css

181 ms

style.css

style.css

203 ms

style.css

style.css

187 ms

style.css

style.css

187 ms

style.css

style.css

188 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

252 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

244 ms

site-header.js

site-header.js

250 ms

responsive-menu.js

responsive-menu.js

250 ms

front-page.js

front-page.js

247 ms

backstretch.js

backstretch.js

281 ms

backstretch-set.js

backstretch-set.js

307 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

383 ms

three.min.js

three.min.js

561 ms

three-orbit-controls.min.js

three-orbit-controls.min.js

384 ms

cardboard.js

cardboard.js

383 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

384 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

386 ms

superfish.args.js

superfish.args.js

398 ms

skip-links.js

skip-links.js

412 ms

fadeup.js

fadeup.js

407 ms

jquery.scrollTo.min.js

jquery.scrollTo.min.js

407 ms

jquery.localScroll.min.js

jquery.localScroll.min.js

463 ms

jquery.cycle2.min.js

jquery.cycle2.min.js

463 ms

jquery.cycle2.carousel.min.js

jquery.cycle2.carousel.min.js

597 ms

jquery.cycle2.swipe.min.js

jquery.cycle2.swipe.min.js

599 ms

jquery.cycle2.tile.min.js

jquery.cycle2.tile.min.js

600 ms

jquery.cycle2.video.min.js

jquery.cycle2.video.min.js

600 ms

script.js

script.js

601 ms

script.js

script.js

502 ms

script.js

script.js

494 ms

client.js

client.js

489 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

487 ms

cropped-4ce8efdcbf7a7281d5bf419eefc54e73.png

cropped-4ce8efdcbf7a7281d5bf419eefc54e73.png

346 ms

minimography_047_orig.jpg

minimography_047_orig.jpg

1594 ms

minimography_068_orig.jpg

minimography_068_orig.jpg

1127 ms

minimography_054_orig.jpg

minimography_054_orig.jpg

1141 ms

blogging-336376_640-1.jpg

blogging-336376_640-1.jpg

347 ms

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7gujVj9w.ttf

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7gujVj9w.ttf

11 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwlxdr3cOWxw.ttf

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwlxdr3cOWxw.ttf

17 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwlxdr3cOWxw.ttf

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwlxdr3cOWxw.ttf

27 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwlxdr3cOWxw.ttf

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwlxdr3cOWxw.ttf

36 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

26 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

36 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

69 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfed3FHGPc.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfed3FHGPc.ttf

35 ms

visitor.css

visitor.css

19 ms

visitor.js

visitor.js

62 ms

teamstatus

teamstatus

98 ms

minimography_049_orig.jpg

minimography_049_orig.jpg

1189 ms

Accessibility Review

designforsite.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

designforsite.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

designforsite.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Designforsite.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Designforsite.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

designforsite.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Design For Site. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: