1.7 sec in total
173 ms
1.5 sec
80 ms
Click here to check amazing Design For Use content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about designforuse.net
We amplify User Experiences for our customers. Have been working to creating the best UX designs for our clients since 2005. Prototyping and a amazing User experiences is what we excel in.
Visit designforuse.netWe analyzed Designforuse.net page load time and found that the first response time was 173 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
designforuse.net performance score
173 ms
588 ms
20 ms
140 ms
202 ms
Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Designforuse.net, 10% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (588 ms) belongs to the original domain Designforuse.net.
Page size can be reduced by 78.3 kB (25%)
310.0 kB
231.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Designforuse.net main page is 310.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 156.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 26.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.3 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 536 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Design For Use images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 45.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 45.9 kB or 29% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Designforuse.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.6 kB or 12% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (83%)
35
6
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Design For Use. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
designforuse.net
173 ms
designforuse.net
588 ms
css
20 ms
core.css
140 ms
flexslider.css
202 ms
app.css
282 ms
jquery.qtip.css
215 ms
modernizr.foundation.js
215 ms
jquery.js
362 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
233 ms
jquery.cookie.js
268 ms
jquery.event.move.js
297 ms
jquery.foundation.forms.js
297 ms
jquery.foundation.mediaQueryToggle.js
304 ms
jquery.foundation.navigation.js
335 ms
jquery.foundation.tabs.js
349 ms
jquery.placeholder.js
357 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
358 ms
jquery.qtip.js
381 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
403 ms
jquery-scrollto.js
416 ms
jquery.jcarousel.css
426 ms
jquery.jacarousel.js
428 ms
jquery.jacarousel.responsive.js
430 ms
jquery.misc.js
448 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.css
470 ms
app.js
485 ms
style.min.css
520 ms
classic-themes.min.css
526 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
88 ms
ga.js
49 ms
img_logo.png
78 ms
all.js
45 ms
bg_banner.jpg
204 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
18 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
18 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
19 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
18 ms
all.js
15 ms
__utm.gif
20 ms
87 ms
designforuse.net SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Designforuse.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Designforuse.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
designforuse.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Design For Use. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: