Tools & Wizards About Us
designingonabudget.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 66

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

designingonabudget.com

Designing On A Budget, Interior Decorating Ideas Cheap!

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

189 ms

Resources Loaded

954 ms

Page Rendered

386 ms

designingonabudget.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Designing On A Budget content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about designingonabudget.com

Do it yourself decorating on a budget, Learn how to design your home for cheap! Budget Design Guide, Get Help with decorating!

Visit designingonabudget.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Designingonabudget.com page load time and found that the first response time was 189 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

designingonabudget.com performance score

66

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

52/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

66/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

81/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value490 ms

59/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.7 s

36/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

designingonabudget.com

189 ms

budgetstyle.css

88 ms

branding.css

16 ms

show_ads.js

4 ms

image-side4.jpg

246 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 32% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Designingonabudget.com, 11% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 11% (5 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (312 ms) relates to the external source Googleads.g.doubleclick.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 65.9 kB (14%)

Content Size

454.3 kB

After Optimization

388.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Designingonabudget.com main page is 454.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 382.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 13.8 kB

  • Original 19.7 kB
  • After minification 19.5 kB
  • After compression 5.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.8 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 39.4 kB

  • Original 382.9 kB
  • After minification 343.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Designing On A Budget images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 9.9 kB

  • Original 47.7 kB
  • After minification 47.6 kB
  • After compression 37.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 9.9 kB or 21% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 2.9 kB

  • Original 3.9 kB
  • After minification 2.9 kB
  • After compression 1.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Designingonabudget.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.9 kB or 74% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (48%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

21

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Designing On A Budget. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

designingonabudget.com

designingonabudget.com

189 ms

budgetstyle.css

budgetstyle.css

88 ms

branding.css

branding.css

16 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

4 ms

image-side4.jpg

image-side4.jpg

246 ms

image-side1.jpg

image-side1.jpg

262 ms

branding.css

branding.css

25 ms

ca-pub-8548135805372133.js

ca-pub-8548135805372133.js

148 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

38 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

86 ms

cm

cm

144 ms

cm

cm

137 ms

ga.js

ga.js

24 ms

body_bg.jpg

body_bg.jpg

131 ms

budgetheader.jpg

budgetheader.jpg

145 ms

wrapper_bg.gif

wrapper_bg.gif

142 ms

round_corner.gif

round_corner.gif

141 ms

round_corner_r.gif

round_corner_r.gif

142 ms

image-side2.jpg

image-side2.jpg

156 ms

image-side3.jpg

image-side3.jpg

214 ms

ir

ir

141 ms

how%20to%20decorate.jpg

how%20to%20decorate.jpg

166 ms

intro2.jpg

intro2.jpg

154 ms

bar_bg.gif

bar_bg.gif

166 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

72 ms

ads

ads

312 ms

41GtTmqcSHL._SL110_.jpg

41GtTmqcSHL._SL110_.jpg

56 ms

18 ms

17 ms

buy-from-tan.gif

buy-from-tan.gif

28 ms

19 ms

19 ms

51VnFPvVU3L._SL110_.jpg

51VnFPvVU3L._SL110_.jpg

57 ms

osd.js

osd.js

18 ms

css

css

55 ms

m_js_controller.js

m_js_controller.js

86 ms

abg.js

abg.js

104 ms

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

31 ms

nessie_icon_magazine_black.png

nessie_icon_magazine_black.png

23 ms

nessie_icon_magazine_white.png

nessie_icon_magazine_white.png

23 ms

s

s

14 ms

x_button_blue2.png

x_button_blue2.png

8 ms

ui

ui

63 ms

Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js

Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js

10 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

48 ms

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

50 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

51 ms

Accessibility Review

designingonabudget.com accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

designingonabudget.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

designingonabudget.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Designingonabudget.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Designingonabudget.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

designingonabudget.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Designing On A Budget. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: