Tools & Wizards About Us
designjeweler.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

designjeweler.com

Design Jewelers

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

40 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

843 ms

designjeweler.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to designjeweler.com homepage info - get ready to check Design Jeweler best content right away, or after learning these important things about designjeweler.com

Visit designjeweler.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Designjeweler.com page load time and found that the first response time was 40 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

designjeweler.com performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.3 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.7 s

68/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value390 ms

69/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.8 s

44/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

designjeweler.com

40 ms

www.designjewelers.com

886 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

58 ms

style.min.css

116 ms

header-footer-elementor.css

162 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Designjeweler.com, 86% (49 requests) were made to Designjewelers.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (886 ms) relates to the external source Designjewelers.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 98.2 kB (5%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Designjeweler.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 94.5 kB

  • Original 110.7 kB
  • After minification 107.8 kB
  • After compression 16.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 94.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Design Jeweler images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.9 kB

  • Original 310.2 kB
  • After minification 310.2 kB
  • After compression 308.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 78.8 kB
  • After minification 78.8 kB
  • After compression 77.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Designjeweler.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (76%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Design Jeweler. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

designjeweler.com

designjeweler.com

40 ms

www.designjewelers.com

www.designjewelers.com

886 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

58 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

116 ms

header-footer-elementor.css

header-footer-elementor.css

162 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

174 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

168 ms

post-24.css

post-24.css

160 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

163 ms

global.css

global.css

175 ms

post-25.css

post-25.css

215 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

216 ms

post-113.css

post-113.css

220 ms

post-132.css

post-132.css

222 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

229 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

230 ms

post-1649.css

post-1649.css

270 ms

css

css

39 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

273 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

271 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

277 ms

regular.min.css

regular.min.css

283 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

292 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

323 ms

post-1669.css

post-1669.css

468 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

469 ms

hello-frontend.min.js

hello-frontend.min.js

468 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

480 ms

api.js

api.js

35 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

480 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

480 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

481 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

482 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

481 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

482 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

483 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

482 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

483 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

484 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

482 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

439 ms

DESIGN-JEWELERS3-1-1-scaled.jpg

DESIGN-JEWELERS3-1-1-scaled.jpg

147 ms

landingpageringflowers-scaled.jpg

landingpageringflowers-scaled.jpg

290 ms

shutterstock_1894290703-1024x683.jpg

shutterstock_1894290703-1024x683.jpg

179 ms

engagepagebottom-scaled.jpg

engagepagebottom-scaled.jpg

290 ms

shutterstock_604141001-scaled.jpg

shutterstock_604141001-scaled.jpg

290 ms

jewelrypagebotom-scaled.jpg

jewelrypagebotom-scaled.jpg

342 ms

shutterstock_749994457-1024x136.jpg

shutterstock_749994457-1024x136.jpg

263 ms

Yelp-Five-Stars-2-1024x576.webp

Yelp-Five-Stars-2-1024x576.webp

264 ms

font

font

37 ms

font

font

49 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

148 ms

font

font

60 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

173 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

201 ms

font

font

146 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

65 ms

Accessibility Review

designjeweler.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

designjeweler.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

designjeweler.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Designjeweler.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Designjeweler.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

designjeweler.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Design Jeweler. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: