4 sec in total
315 ms
3.3 sec
425 ms
Visit designthinking.services now to see the best up-to-date Design Thinking content for Peru and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about designthinking.services
¡Desbloquee el poder del pensamiento de diseño con la ayuda de Comunidad! Prepárese para liberar nuevos niveles de creatividad e innovación
Visit designthinking.servicesWe analyzed Designthinking.services page load time and found that the first response time was 315 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
designthinking.services performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
22/100
10%
Value4.3 s
41/100
25%
Value8.1 s
21/100
10%
Value1,040 ms
25/100
30%
Value0.06
98/100
15%
Value12.5 s
14/100
10%
315 ms
788 ms
34 ms
62 ms
295 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Designthinking.services, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fundingchoicesmessages.google.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Designthinking.services.
Page size can be reduced by 136.8 kB (20%)
694.4 kB
557.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Designthinking.services main page is 694.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 469.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 126.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 126.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Design Thinking images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 22 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (77%)
73
17
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Design Thinking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
designthinking.services
315 ms
www.designthinking.services
788 ms
css
34 ms
js
62 ms
dashicons.min.css
295 ms
admin-bar.min.css
351 ms
admin-menu.min.css
328 ms
style.min.css
465 ms
style.min.css
360 ms
templates.min.css
474 ms
style.css
456 ms
font-awesome-legacy.min.css
494 ms
grid-system.css
485 ms
style.css
613 ms
element-testimonial.css
583 ms
element-scrolling-text.css
599 ms
element-highlighted-text.css
615 ms
element-tabbed-section.css
621 ms
element-video-lightbox.css
620 ms
element-wpb-column-border.css
742 ms
events-calendar.css
755 ms
responsive.css
758 ms
flickity.css
773 ms
ascend.css
770 ms
menu-dynamic.css
760 ms
js_composer.min.css
883 ms
styles.min.css
933 ms
salient-dynamic-styles.css
936 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
891 ms
jquery.min.js
968 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
895 ms
functions.min.js
1026 ms
adsbygoogle.js
62 ms
pub-2594719049173548
79 ms
style-non-critical.css
999 ms
magnific.css
999 ms
core.css
1000 ms
slide-out-right-hover.css
999 ms
hoverintent-js.min.js
1043 ms
admin-bar.min.js
1135 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
1135 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
1138 ms
priority.js
952 ms
transit.min.js
994 ms
waypoints.js
970 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
1005 ms
hoverintent.min.js
924 ms
magnific.js
925 ms
touchswipe.min.js
920 ms
nectar-testimonial-slider.js
1014 ms
anime.min.js
1005 ms
nectar-animated-gradient.js
887 ms
flickity.js
961 ms
superfish.js
912 ms
init.js
1133 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1010 ms
scripts.min.js
1038 ms
wp-consent-api.min.js
935 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
932 ms
pub-2594719049173548
57 ms
comunidad-design-thinking-herramientas-proyectos-logo-negro.png
664 ms
WEB.jpg
1039 ms
herramientas-292x300.png
793 ms
comunidad-277x300.png
818 ms
conexiones-264x300.png
804 ms
eventos-277x300.png
842 ms
LISTA-MEJORES-LIBROS-SOBRE-DESIGN-THINKING-300x300.jpg
847 ms
Isaac-Curso-2-1994-140x140.jpg
860 ms
Clenia-new-profile-picture5539-140x140.jpg
845 ms
C34F9FA2-7554-4F50-8FFD-BF48867C5950-140x140.jpeg
918 ms
Foto-CV-2020-bn4791-140x140.png
911 ms
Captura-de-pantalla-2022-12-30-a-las-22.57.30-300x268.png
1024 ms
paolo-300x300.jpg
997 ms
beaasds-300x300.jpg
1005 ms
belenas-300x300.jpg
1087 ms
font
72 ms
icomoon.woff
993 ms
wARDj0u
2 ms
designthinking.services accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
designthinking.services best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
designthinking.services SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ES
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Designthinking.services can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Designthinking.services main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
designthinking.services
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Design Thinking. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: