Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

Page Load Speed

9.2 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

6.5 sec

Page Rendered

1.4 sec

destinationsolihull.com screenshot

About Website

Visit destinationsolihull.com now to see the best up-to-date Destinationsolihull content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about destinationsolihull.com

Visit destinationsolihull.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Destinationsolihull.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 7.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

destinationsolihull.com performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

14/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value25.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.3 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10,640 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.008

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.2 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

visitsolihull.co.uk

1244 ms

script.js

119 ms

hjm8wmv.css

217 ms

screen-2c3b90f20f.min.css

230 ms

jquery.min.js

212 ms

Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Destinationsolihull.com, 12% (10 requests) were made to S.w.org and 9% (8 requests) were made to Scontent-iad3-1.cdninstagram.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.5 sec) relates to the external source Visitsolihull.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 636.5 kB (9%)

Content Size

7.5 MB

After Optimization

6.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Destinationsolihull.com main page is 7.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 6.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 460.7 kB

  • Original 595.9 kB
  • After minification 568.4 kB
  • After compression 135.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 460.7 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 175.5 kB

  • Original 6.6 MB
  • After minification 6.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Destinationsolihull images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 132 B

  • Original 228.1 kB
  • After minification 228.1 kB
  • After compression 227.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 112 B

  • Original 62.1 kB
  • After minification 62.1 kB
  • After compression 62.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Destinationsolihull.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (28%)

Requests Now

78

After Optimization

56

The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Destinationsolihull. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

destinationsolihull.com accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

destinationsolihull.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

destinationsolihull.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Destinationsolihull.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Destinationsolihull.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Destinationsolihull. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: