3.6 sec in total
826 ms
2.6 sec
243 ms
Click here to check amazing Dexon content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about dexon.com
Since 1992, Dexon has been within the technology industry maintaining brands that are the backbone of networks we rely on every day. Whether you’re looking for Cisco/Meraki, HPE/Aruba, Juniper, Dell w...
Visit dexon.comWe analyzed Dexon.com page load time and found that the first response time was 826 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
dexon.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
58/100
10%
Value7.6 s
4/100
25%
Value6.8 s
34/100
10%
Value2,970 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.029
100/100
15%
Value11.5 s
18/100
10%
826 ms
164 ms
487 ms
517 ms
657 ms
Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Dexon.com, 64% (21 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 21% (7 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 455.0 kB (65%)
698.0 kB
243.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Dexon.com main page is 698.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 566.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 446.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 446.1 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Dexon images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 7.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (42%)
24
14
The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dexon. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.dexon.com
826 ms
minified.js
164 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
487 ms
polyfill.min.js
517 ms
bootstrap-features.88016560.bundle.min.js
657 ms
main.dca78a96.bundle.min.js
658 ms
lodash.min.js
674 ms
react.production.min.js
675 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
673 ms
wix-perf-measure.bundle.min.js
275 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
415 ms
c236d5_68d461df0a3b4ae6848eb02b7d5093a1~mv2_d_6001_4001_s_4_2.jpg
857 ms
thunderbolt
589 ms
Dexon%2C%20LOGO%20WHITE.png
826 ms
c236d5_e00b0f6ca9c946019b70f95979e4e4f3~mv2.jpg
749 ms
AdobeStock_115457793.jpeg
862 ms
P1470652.jpg
867 ms
P1470597.jpg
794 ms
AdobeStock_192261183.jpeg
1117 ms
elementory-browser-support.min.js
412 ms
4021a3b9-f782-438b-aeb4-c008109a8b64.woff
98 ms
b56b944e-bbe0-4450-a241-de2125d3e682.woff
101 ms
6f8d1983-4d34-4fa4-9110-988f6c495757.woff
38 ms
61bd362e-7162-46bd-b67e-28f366c4afbe.woff
39 ms
e2b9cbeb-fa8e-41cd-8a6a-46044b29ba52.woff
96 ms
thunderbolt
65 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
8 ms
bolt-performance
223 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
17 ms
right-arrow.svg
129 ms
WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff
20 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff
50 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff
51 ms
dexon.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
dexon.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
dexon.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dexon.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Dexon.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
dexon.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Dexon. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: