2.2 sec in total
169 ms
1.5 sec
522 ms
Click here to check amazing DFW Microblading content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about dfwmicroblading.com
Visit dfwmicroblading.comWe analyzed Dfwmicroblading.com page load time and found that the first response time was 169 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
dfwmicroblading.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
42/100
10%
Value5.2 s
23/100
25%
Value5.8 s
49/100
10%
Value660 ms
45/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value8.6 s
37/100
10%
169 ms
812 ms
11 ms
19 ms
22 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Dfwmicroblading.com, 14% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (812 ms) belongs to the original domain Dfwmicroblading.com.
Page size can be reduced by 173.8 kB (17%)
992.9 kB
819.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Dfwmicroblading.com main page is 992.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 462.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 76.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 76.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. DFW Microblading images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 71.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 71.8 kB or 25% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 25.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dfwmicroblading.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 25.3 kB or 17% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (74%)
61
16
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of DFW Microblading. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
dfwmicroblading.com
169 ms
www.dfwmicroblading.com
812 ms
style.min.css
11 ms
font-awesome-legacy.min.css
19 ms
grid-system.css
22 ms
style.css
33 ms
element-testimonial.css
30 ms
element-tabbed-section.css
29 ms
element-toggles.css
27 ms
css
65 ms
responsive.css
22 ms
select2.css
25 ms
ascend.css
29 ms
menu-dynamic.css
44 ms
js_composer.min.css
51 ms
salient-dynamic-styles.css
44 ms
css
73 ms
jquery.min.js
42 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
42 ms
es6-promise.auto.min.js
52 ms
recaptcha.js
51 ms
css
130 ms
twentytwenty.css
63 ms
style.css
51 ms
style-non-critical.css
52 ms
magnific.css
53 ms
core.css
52 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
53 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
55 ms
priority.js
53 ms
transit.min.js
54 ms
waypoints.js
54 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
55 ms
hoverintent.min.js
56 ms
magnific.js
57 ms
anime.min.js
55 ms
touchswipe.min.js
56 ms
nectar-testimonial-slider.js
57 ms
jquery.twentytwenty.js
59 ms
superfish.js
58 ms
init.js
62 ms
select2.min.js
55 ms
common.js
47 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
47 ms
jquery.uniform.min.js
44 ms
custom.js
44 ms
idle-timer.min.js
41 ms
analytics.js
225 ms
dfw-microblading-logo-gray.png
141 ms
dfw-microblading-logo-white.png
198 ms
Webp.net-resizeimage-1.jpg
243 ms
microblading-1-2.png
200 ms
microblading-2-2.png
201 ms
Becky-Shelton-Headshot.jpeg
199 ms
southlake-microblading.jpg
201 ms
microblading-in-Dallas.jpg
198 ms
Screen-Shot-2016-03-11-at-11.12.54-AM-296x300.png
405 ms
Screen-Shot-2016-03-11-at-11.15.46-AM.jpg
201 ms
Screenshot-2016-06-12-21.19.55-295x300.png
403 ms
gift-card.png
202 ms
QdVUSTchPBm7nuUeVf70viFg.ttf
125 ms
tDbI2oqRg1oM3QBjjcaDkOr9rAA.ttf
126 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
185 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
198 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
201 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
200 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
202 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
201 ms
icomoon.woff
81 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
198 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
202 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtY.ttf
201 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
122 ms
collect
82 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
18 ms
collect
69 ms
js
87 ms
ga-audiences
44 ms
dfwmicroblading.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
dfwmicroblading.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
dfwmicroblading.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dfwmicroblading.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Dfwmicroblading.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
dfwmicroblading.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of DFW Microblading. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: