3.6 sec in total
694 ms
2.8 sec
151 ms
Click here to check amazing DGM content for Bulgaria. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about dgm.bg
Професионално ИТ обслужване – cloud ИТ инфраструктура, виртуални сървъри, клауд, vps, поддръжка, администрация, управление, консолидация, хостинг услуги
Visit dgm.bgWe analyzed Dgm.bg page load time and found that the first response time was 694 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
dgm.bg performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
49/100
10%
Value5.7 s
16/100
25%
Value5.0 s
63/100
10%
Value160 ms
94/100
30%
Value0.032
100/100
15%
Value6.8 s
55/100
10%
694 ms
197 ms
311 ms
334 ms
334 ms
Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Dgm.bg, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Dgm.bg.
Page size can be reduced by 64.8 kB (22%)
294.8 kB
230.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Dgm.bg main page is 294.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 138.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 44.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.8 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, DGM needs image optimization as it can save up to 15.0 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dgm.bg needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.5 kB or 13% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (44%)
48
27
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of DGM. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
dgm.bg
694 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
197 ms
style.min.css
311 ms
classic-themes.min.css
334 ms
styles.css
334 ms
style.css
338 ms
slider.css
340 ms
jquery.min.js
452 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
419 ms
promoslider.js
443 ms
narrow-plain.css
445 ms
default.css
368 ms
layout.css
373 ms
type.css
451 ms
form.css
474 ms
scripts.js
534 ms
navigation.js
534 ms
analytics.js
73 ms
cloud.png
691 ms
logo.png
114 ms
zoom.png
115 ms
rae.png
114 ms
bgnd-bigflag.png
112 ms
fact-line.png
113 ms
rae-footer.png
114 ms
cert1.png
224 ms
cert2.png
224 ms
hotline.png
224 ms
pix.png
224 ms
helpdesk.png
223 ms
div.png
226 ms
support.png
689 ms
consult.png
692 ms
2.png
798 ms
73.png
801 ms
96.png
802 ms
82.png
836 ms
95.png
909 ms
42.png
912 ms
13.png
913 ms
24.png
946 ms
75.png
1019 ms
10.png
1022 ms
17.png
1026 ms
20.png
1058 ms
Roboto-Condensed-webfont.woff
388 ms
Roboto-BoldCondensed-webfont.woff
391 ms
collect
13 ms
dot-on.png
256 ms
dot.png
256 ms
js
75 ms
dgm.bg accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
dgm.bg best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
dgm.bg SEO score
BG
BG
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dgm.bg can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Bulgarian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Dgm.bg main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
dgm.bg
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of DGM. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: