10.7 sec in total
2.3 sec
7.1 sec
1.3 sec
Welcome to diaxion.com homepage info - get ready to check Diaxion best content right away, or after learning these important things about diaxion.com
Enterprise IT strategy & optimisation to scale your business. Go from tech-centricity to service-driven outcomes & measurable ROI your CFO and CTO will love!
Visit diaxion.comWe analyzed Diaxion.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.3 sec and then it took 8.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
diaxion.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
11/100
10%
Value28.3 s
0/100
25%
Value10.9 s
6/100
10%
Value600 ms
50/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value9.7 s
28/100
10%
2271 ms
214 ms
430 ms
621 ms
833 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Diaxion.com, 10% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Diaxion.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (36%)
4.4 MB
2.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Diaxion.com main page is 4.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 108.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 108.4 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.5 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Diaxion needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.5 MB or 38% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 3.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 6.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Diaxion.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (69%)
68
21
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Diaxion. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
diaxion.com
2271 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
214 ms
style.min.css
430 ms
classic-themes.min.css
621 ms
style.css
833 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
634 ms
frontend-legacy.min.css
641 ms
frontend.min.css
650 ms
swiper.min.css
648 ms
post-8.css
826 ms
frontend.min.css
1064 ms
all.min.css
856 ms
v4-shims.min.css
861 ms
global.css
863 ms
post-11.css
1033 ms
post-13.css
1040 ms
post-55.css
1075 ms
css
28 ms
fontawesome.min.css
1076 ms
solid.min.css
1079 ms
brands.min.css
1239 ms
index.js
1247 ms
v4-shims.min.js
1275 ms
js
69 ms
animations.min.css
1389 ms
jquery.min.js
1512 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1404 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
1455 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
1493 ms
jquery-numerator.min.js
1493 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
1507 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
1509 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1655 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1703 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1708 ms
hooks.min.js
1713 ms
i18n.min.js
1714 ms
frontend.min.js
1718 ms
waypoints.min.js
1861 ms
core.min.js
1703 ms
swiper.min.js
1503 ms
share-link.min.js
1309 ms
dialog.min.js
1305 ms
frontend.min.js
1301 ms
preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js
1639 ms
preloaded-modules.min.js
1474 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
1315 ms
LOGO.png
845 ms
main-panel.png
2329 ms
1STRATANDARCH.png
853 ms
2INFRASTRUCT.png
1035 ms
3INFRACODE.png
1056 ms
4CLOUDSERVICE.png
1057 ms
img-65.jpg
1491 ms
icon.png
1192 ms
1Hero_image_CasestudyLargeMutual-300x166.jpg
1242 ms
1Hero_image_CasestudyConsulting-300x166.jpg
1269 ms
CSHero_image_Multinational-300x166.jpg
1268 ms
CSHero_image_Azure-300x166.jpg
1400 ms
quotemark.png
1345 ms
partners-1024x228.png
1584 ms
js
92 ms
analytics.js
20 ms
pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4GiClXs1Ug.ttf
34 ms
pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4GVilXs1Ug.ttf
73 ms
pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4G1ilXs1Ug.ttf
88 ms
pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4G5ClXs1Ug.ttf
91 ms
pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4GCC5Xs1Ug.ttf
90 ms
pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4GMS5Xs1Ug.ttf
90 ms
pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4GVi5Xs1Ug.ttf
88 ms
pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4Gfy5Xs1Ug.ttf
88 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1784 ms
collect
69 ms
starlight-supporter.png
1435 ms
logowhite.png
1465 ms
collect
101 ms
ga-audiences
27 ms
print.css
214 ms
diaxion.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
diaxion.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
diaxion.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Diaxion.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Diaxion.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
diaxion.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Diaxion. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: