Tools & Wizards About Us
dibpak.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 11

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    24% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

dibpak.com

Dubai Islamic Bank

Page Load Speed

4.5 sec in total

First Response

70 ms

Resources Loaded

4.3 sec

Page Rendered

147 ms

dibpak.com screenshot

About Website

Visit dibpak.com now to see the best up-to-date Dibpak content for Pakistan and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about dibpak.com

The first Islamic bank to incorporate the principles of Sharia in all practices.

Visit dibpak.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Dibpak.com page load time and found that the first response time was 70 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

dibpak.com performance score

11

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

25/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.5 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,020 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.389

26/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.4 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

dibpak.com

70 ms

dibpak.com

465 ms

www.dibpak.com

1012 ms

style.min.css

81 ms

styles.css

415 ms

Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Dibpak.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Dibpak.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 159.3 kB (4%)

Content Size

3.7 MB

After Optimization

3.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Dibpak.com main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 120.5 kB

  • Original 143.5 kB
  • After minification 130.4 kB
  • After compression 22.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 120.5 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1 B

  • Original 3.1 MB
  • After minification 3.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Dibpak images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 33.4 kB

  • Original 383.6 kB
  • After minification 383.6 kB
  • After compression 350.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 5.3 kB

  • Original 54.8 kB
  • After minification 54.8 kB
  • After compression 49.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dibpak.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (59%)

Requests Now

70

After Optimization

29

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dibpak. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

dibpak.com

dibpak.com

70 ms

dibpak.com

dibpak.com

465 ms

www.dibpak.com

www.dibpak.com

1012 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

81 ms

styles.css

styles.css

415 ms

css

css

49 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

706 ms

style.css

style.css

731 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

79 ms

owl.theme.css

owl.theme.css

103 ms

homeslider.css

homeslider.css

116 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

141 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

712 ms

amcustom.css

amcustom.css

140 ms

icon-manager.css

icon-manager.css

536 ms

Defaults.css

Defaults.css

1379 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

434 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

464 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

72 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

36 ms

js

js

63 ms

enterprise.js

enterprise.js

53 ms

js

js

123 ms

index.js

index.js

392 ms

index.js

index.js

415 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

437 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

464 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

460 ms

velocity.min.js

velocity.min.js

487 ms

velocity.ui.min.js

velocity.ui.min.js

507 ms

api.js

api.js

25 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

507 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

540 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

533 ms

index.js

index.js

558 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

233 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

234 ms

icon-location.png

icon-location.png

228 ms

shad.png

shad.png

230 ms

logo2.png

logo2.png

228 ms

acc.png

acc.png

228 ms

cf.png

cf.png

228 ms

bb.png

bb.png

228 ms

otherlogo.png

otherlogo.png

382 ms

pw.png

pw.png

381 ms

rem.png

rem.png

381 ms

hp.png

hp.png

380 ms

cards.png

cards.png

231 ms

takaful_a.png

takaful_a.png

381 ms

takaful_b.png

takaful_b.png

380 ms

rda.png

rda.png

381 ms

Icon_car_2.png

Icon_car_2.png

428 ms

home_fin_2.png

home_fin_2.png

381 ms

Icon_home_prsnl_fin.png

Icon_home_prsnl_fin.png

427 ms

play-store.png

play-store.png

380 ms

apple.png

apple.png

427 ms

huawei1.png

huawei1.png

425 ms

jama-punji.png

jama-punji.png

426 ms

contact-us.png

contact-us.png

426 ms

g-play-black.png

g-play-black.png

430 ms

apple-black.png

apple-black.png

430 ms

huawei2.png

huawei2.png

429 ms

google-play-badge-e1537315730712.png

google-play-badge-e1537315730712.png

428 ms

download-e1537315683266.png

download-e1537315683266.png

430 ms

js

js

313 ms

Signature-Web-Banner1920x600.jpg

Signature-Web-Banner1920x600.jpg

458 ms

js

js

281 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

275 ms

neosanspro.ttf

neosanspro.ttf

543 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

274 ms

neosanspro-medium.ttf

neosanspro-medium.ttf

568 ms

neosanspro-bold.ttf

neosanspro-bold.ttf

573 ms

collect

collect

16 ms

collect

collect

17 ms

1920x600-Banner-with-Logo.jpg

1920x600-Banner-with-Logo.jpg

594 ms

Aayan-Web-Banner-1920x600-1.jpg

Aayan-Web-Banner-1920x600-1.jpg

27 ms

Raast-Banner-02.jpg

Raast-Banner-02.jpg

75 ms

DIB-Corporate-Banner-2020-2.jpg

DIB-Corporate-Banner-2020-2.jpg

693 ms

Digital-Banking-Banner-without-Text.jpg

Digital-Banking-Banner-without-Text.jpg

277 ms

t2.png

t2.png

362 ms

PSW-3.png

PSW-3.png

319 ms

Accessibility Review

dibpak.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

dibpak.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

dibpak.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dibpak.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Dibpak.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

dibpak.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Dibpak. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: