936 ms in total
204 ms
731 ms
1 ms
Visit didifables.net now to see the best up-to-date Didifables content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about didifables.net
didifables.net is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, didifables.net has it all. We hope you fi...
Visit didifables.netWe analyzed Didifables.net page load time and found that the first response time was 204 ms and then it took 732 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
didifables.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
66/100
10%
Value5.9 s
14/100
25%
Value2.7 s
96/100
10%
Value4,180 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value21.7 s
1/100
10%
204 ms
175 ms
172 ms
71 ms
77 ms
Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Didifables.net, 86% (19 requests) were made to Next.subkit.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Fractionalexecutives.subkit.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (204 ms) belongs to the original domain Didifables.net.
Page size can be reduced by 82.2 kB (37%)
223.7 kB
141.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Didifables.net main page is 223.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 117.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 76.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 76.1 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 239 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Didifables images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 5.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 152 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Didifables.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 152 B or 17% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (90%)
20
2
The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Didifables. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
didifables.net
204 ms
personalized-one-to-one-entrepreneur-coaching-prog-wxmyo
175 ms
bundle.js
172 ms
4b6398dde1384489.css
71 ms
polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js
77 ms
webpack-0ce9181ecb40e917.js
69 ms
framework-30835d7902f44e99.js
106 ms
main-f84ca3ed94ce16e2.js
74 ms
_app-706060e1dd9d3bee.js
123 ms
7397-e1f4410789ade326.js
74 ms
2852-571af9645d690a5e.js
103 ms
2935-034cb13a0ac15a04.js
103 ms
1253-5a3be4cd54a1bf6d.js
115 ms
9407-55e678e54fd0dfcb.js
116 ms
4025-222234b6b08ab222.js
115 ms
2271-8c2810ce706477a0.js
117 ms
8070-09606425854e8035.js
116 ms
2259-70387ae4421e5102.js
116 ms
3429-33bbed9ec4f38678.js
117 ms
%5BplanPriceSlug%5D-28c5933bdbca1e85.js
118 ms
_buildManifest.js
119 ms
_ssgManifest.js
116 ms
didifables.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
didifables.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
didifables.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Didifables.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Didifables.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
didifables.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Didifables. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: