Tools & Wizards About Us
didtheycheat.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

didtheycheat.com

Bust A Cheater Free !! How To Catch A Cheating Spouse

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

50 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

528 ms

didtheycheat.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Didtheycheat content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about didtheycheat.com

Bust a Cheater !!! How to Catch your Cheating Spouse, partner husband wife BF GF? Do you want to find out if your husband is cheating by phone or email ? OR are you a man whose wife is caught up in an...

Visit didtheycheat.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Didtheycheat.com page load time and found that the first response time was 50 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

didtheycheat.com performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

78/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.0 s

6/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.5 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,210 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.352

31/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.2 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

didtheycheat.com

50 ms

didtheycheat.com

915 ms

style.min.css

149 ms

um-messaging.min.css

191 ms

oxygen.css

184 ms

Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Didtheycheat.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Didtheycheat.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 176.7 kB (10%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Didtheycheat.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 80.1 kB

  • Original 101.9 kB
  • After minification 101.9 kB
  • After compression 21.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.1 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 93.9 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Didtheycheat images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 338 B

  • Original 258.4 kB
  • After minification 258.4 kB
  • After compression 258.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.4 kB

  • Original 100.7 kB
  • After minification 98.7 kB
  • After compression 98.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Didtheycheat.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 60 (86%)

Requests Now

70

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Didtheycheat. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

didtheycheat.com

didtheycheat.com

50 ms

didtheycheat.com

didtheycheat.com

915 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

149 ms

um-messaging.min.css

um-messaging.min.css

191 ms

oxygen.css

oxygen.css

184 ms

um-modal.min.css

um-modal.min.css

211 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

217 ms

tipsy.min.css

tipsy.min.css

188 ms

um-raty.min.css

um-raty.min.css

274 ms

select2.min.css

select2.min.css

324 ms

um-fileupload.min.css

um-fileupload.min.css

323 ms

um-confirm.min.css

um-confirm.min.css

322 ms

default.min.css

default.min.css

359 ms

default.date.min.css

default.date.min.css

364 ms

default.time.min.css

default.time.min.css

398 ms

fonticons-ii.min.css

fonticons-ii.min.css

457 ms

fonticons-fa.min.css

fonticons-fa.min.css

467 ms

um-fontawesome.min.css

um-fontawesome.min.css

495 ms

common.min.css

common.min.css

506 ms

um-responsive.min.css

um-responsive.min.css

505 ms

um-styles.min.css

um-styles.min.css

513 ms

cropper.min.css

cropper.min.css

597 ms

um-profile.min.css

um-profile.min.css

599 ms

um-account.min.css

um-account.min.css

640 ms

um-misc.min.css

um-misc.min.css

635 ms

um-old-default.min.css

um-old-default.min.css

646 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

686 ms

um-gdpr.min.js

um-gdpr.min.js

741 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

89 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

147 ms

amp-auto-ads-0.1.js

amp-auto-ads-0.1.js

50 ms

js

js

80 ms

127050.css

127050.css

737 ms

126998.css

126998.css

812 ms

universal.css

universal.css

813 ms

aos.css

aos.css

819 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

819 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

896 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

900 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

922 ms

tipsy.min.js

tipsy.min.js

910 ms

beacon.min.js

beacon.min.js

67 ms

um-confirm.min.js

um-confirm.min.js

934 ms

picker.min.js

picker.min.js

794 ms

picker.date.min.js

picker.date.min.js

892 ms

picker.time.min.js

picker.time.min.js

885 ms

common.min.js

common.min.js

872 ms

cropper.min.js

cropper.min.js

870 ms

common-frontend.min.js

common-frontend.min.js

873 ms

um-modal.min.js

um-modal.min.js

787 ms

jquery-form.min.js

jquery-form.min.js

890 ms

fileupload.js

fileupload.js

885 ms

um-functions.min.js

um-functions.min.js

890 ms

um-responsive.min.js

um-responsive.min.js

879 ms

um-conditional.min.js

um-conditional.min.js

871 ms

select2.full.min.js

select2.full.min.js

840 ms

en.js

en.js

885 ms

um-raty.min.js

um-raty.min.js

869 ms

um-scripts.min.js

um-scripts.min.js

845 ms

um-profile.min.js

um-profile.min.js

883 ms

um-account.min.js

um-account.min.js

879 ms

aos.js

aos.js

860 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

77 ms

Logo-W@2x.png

Logo-W@2x.png

137 ms

DTC-NEW-LOGO-2019-Thin-Header-transp.png

DTC-NEW-LOGO-2019-Thin-Header-transp.png

663 ms

didtheycheat-he-cheated-and-now-he-is-screwed-find-out-why.jpg

didtheycheat-he-cheated-and-now-he-is-screwed-find-out-why.jpg

668 ms

verb-commodity.gif

verb-commodity.gif

1155 ms

this-cant-be-good-didtheycheat-login-page.jpg

this-cant-be-good-didtheycheat-login-page.jpg

645 ms

world-gym-london-canada-fitness-tracker-cheating-spouse-didtheycheat-site.jpg

world-gym-london-canada-fitness-tracker-cheating-spouse-didtheycheat-site.jpg

678 ms

FB_IMG_1709805277090.jpg

FB_IMG_1709805277090.jpg

668 ms

FB_IMG_1722874131324.jpg

FB_IMG_1722874131324.jpg

805 ms

IMG_0145.jpeg

IMG_0145.jpeg

780 ms

main.js

main.js

9 ms

Accessibility Review

didtheycheat.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

didtheycheat.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

didtheycheat.com SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Didtheycheat.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Didtheycheat.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

didtheycheat.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Didtheycheat. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: