Tools & Wizards About Us
dieop.io screenshot

Report Summary

  • 76

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

dieop.io

Page Load Speed

622 ms in total

First Response

239 ms

Resources Loaded

319 ms

Page Rendered

64 ms

dieop.io screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Dieop content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about dieop.io

Visit dieop.io

Key Findings

We analyzed Dieop.io page load time and found that the first response time was 239 ms and then it took 383 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

dieop.io performance score

76

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

47/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.9 s

82/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.033

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.1 s

87/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

dieop.io

239 ms

ww25.dieop.io

78 ms

bsEsSVmsb.js

3 ms

Our browser made a total of 3 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Dieop.io, 67% (2 requests) were made to Ww25.dieop.io. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (239 ms) belongs to the original domain Dieop.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 6.1 kB (44%)

Content Size

13.8 kB

After Optimization

7.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Dieop.io main page is 13.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 12.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 351 B

  • Original 1.2 kB
  • After minification 1.1 kB
  • After compression 812 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 351 B or 30% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-46%

Potential reduce by 5.8 kB

  • Original 12.6 kB
  • After minification 6.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Dieop needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.8 kB or 46% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

1

After Optimization

1

  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dieop. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

dieop.io

dieop.io

239 ms

ww25.dieop.io

ww25.dieop.io

78 ms

bsEsSVmsb.js

bsEsSVmsb.js

3 ms

Accessibility Review

dieop.io accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

dieop.io best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

dieop.io SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dieop.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Dieop.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

dieop.io

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Dieop. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: