Tools & Wizards About Us
diffchecker.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

diffchecker.in

Page Load Speed

319 ms in total

First Response

25 ms

Resources Loaded

294 ms

Page Rendered

0 ms

diffchecker.in screenshot

About Website

Visit diffchecker.in now to see the best up-to-date Diffchecker content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about diffchecker.in

DiffChecker.in is Online tool to compare text to find the difference between two contents / text files

Visit diffchecker.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Diffchecker.in page load time and found that the first response time was 25 ms and then it took 294 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

diffchecker.in performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

diffchecker.in

25 ms

diffchecker.in

44 ms

keyboard.js

9 ms

adsbygoogle.js

116 ms

2.829c9cb5.chunk.css

44 ms

Our browser made a total of 8 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Diffchecker.in, 13% (1 request) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (116 ms) relates to the external source Pagead2.googlesyndication.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 273.6 kB (74%)

Content Size

369.1 kB

After Optimization

95.5 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Diffchecker.in main page is 369.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 219.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-53%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 4.3 kB
  • After minification 4.3 kB
  • After compression 2.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 2.3 kB or 53% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 148.9 kB

  • Original 219.4 kB
  • After minification 219.4 kB
  • After compression 70.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 148.9 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 122.3 kB

  • Original 145.4 kB
  • After minification 145.4 kB
  • After compression 23.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Diffchecker.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 122.3 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (50%)

Requests Now

6

After Optimization

3

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 6 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Diffchecker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

diffchecker.in

diffchecker.in

25 ms

diffchecker.in

diffchecker.in

44 ms

keyboard.js

keyboard.js

9 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

116 ms

2.829c9cb5.chunk.css

2.829c9cb5.chunk.css

44 ms

main.7533c534.chunk.css

main.7533c534.chunk.css

66 ms

2.f3135f3e.chunk.js

2.f3135f3e.chunk.js

73 ms

main.e779af48.chunk.js

main.e779af48.chunk.js

72 ms

SEO Factors

diffchecker.in SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Diffchecker.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Diffchecker.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

diffchecker.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Diffchecker. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: