4.2 sec in total
303 ms
3.3 sec
595 ms
Visit differdange.lu now to see the best up-to-date Differdange content for Luxembourg and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about differdange.lu
Retrouvez toutes les informations pratiques, les services et démarches, les actualités et événements de la Ville de Differdange.
Visit differdange.luWe analyzed Differdange.lu page load time and found that the first response time was 303 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
differdange.lu performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
22/100
10%
Value4.5 s
36/100
25%
Value9.2 s
13/100
10%
Value370 ms
71/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value10.5 s
23/100
10%
303 ms
1070 ms
32 ms
195 ms
286 ms
Our browser made a total of 109 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (91 requests) were addressed to the original Differdange.lu, 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Static.elfsight.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Differdange.lu.
Page size can be reduced by 146.8 kB (4%)
3.3 MB
3.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Differdange.lu main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 116.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 116.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Differdange images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 10.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Differdange.lu has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (58%)
101
42
The browser has sent 101 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Differdange. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 46 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
differdange.lu
303 ms
differdange.lu
1070 ms
css
32 ms
main.css
195 ms
responsive.css
286 ms
style.min.css
381 ms
styles.css
290 ms
events-manager.min.css
481 ms
events-manager-pro.css
294 ms
style.css
385 ms
jquery-ui.css
18 ms
jquery.min.js
479 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
385 ms
functions.js
389 ms
nfpluginsettings.js
476 ms
nfpluginsettings.js
477 ms
core.min.js
479 ms
mouse.min.js
507 ms
sortable.min.js
573 ms
datepicker.min.js
576 ms
resizable.min.js
575 ms
draggable.min.js
580 ms
controlgroup.min.js
579 ms
checkboxradio.min.js
582 ms
button.min.js
670 ms
dialog.min.js
670 ms
events-manager.min.js
863 ms
fr.min.js
672 ms
events-manager-pro.js
674 ms
platform.js
31 ms
index.js
594 ms
index.js
680 ms
control.js
680 ms
jquery.auto-complete.min.js
25 ms
validate.js
684 ms
api.js
41 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
685 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
689 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
879 ms
index.js
803 ms
ml-widget.js
460 ms
tweenmax.js
805 ms
magnific.js
803 ms
platform.js
34 ms
fracs.js
698 ms
swiper.js
712 ms
gtm.js
44 ms
isotope.js
706 ms
hoverIntent.js
716 ms
sorTable.min.js
714 ms
main.js
628 ms
languagecourses.js
698 ms
attentionbanner.js
705 ms
changefontsize.js
704 ms
patchNinjaForm.js
617 ms
appstore.svg
270 ms
gplay.svg
268 ms
binsfeld.svg
287 ms
logo.svg
269 ms
bgtop.jpg
465 ms
search.svg
276 ms
icon-bike.svg
316 ms
icon-bus.svg
315 ms
icon-interview.svg
363 ms
icon-student.svg
365 ms
icon-family.svg
372 ms
icon-livingroom.svg
412 ms
BluesExpress2023-min-1024x683.jpg
600 ms
fb-cafe-des-langues-1024x576.jpg
552 ms
inondations-1024x678.webp
462 ms
20240611_cours-des-langues-2-683x1024.jpg
657 ms
steel-run-1024x683.jpg
698 ms
20220215_salle-seance-4-1024x683.jpg
654 ms
arrow-left.svg
560 ms
arrow-right.svg
653 ms
Konscht-am-Minett-2024-528x388.jpg
656 ms
icon-marker.svg
696 ms
icon-euro.svg
744 ms
33_190707-Sports-plein-air-8-528x388.jpg
748 ms
repair-jeshoots-com-VdOO4_HFTWM-unsplash-528x388.jpg
755 ms
bitzen-scaled.jpg
755 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDFwmdTQ3ig.ttf
56 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDBImdTQ3ig.ttf
71 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDGUmdTQ3ig.ttf
124 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDLshdTQ3ig.ttf
125 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDDshdTQ3ig.ttf
125 ms
container_w2WgryRg.js
567 ms
recaptcha__en.js
66 ms
Michel_Jonasz-scaled.jpg
789 ms
Summer-Austellung-Photoclub-528x388.png
695 ms
MTB-Train-1900-528x388.jpg
833 ms
diffmag-1024x683.jpg
922 ms
icon-association.svg
740 ms
icon-house.svg
738 ms
icon-commerce.svg
695 ms
icon-pro.svg
753 ms
icon-tourism.svg
721 ms
119 ms
icon-elder.svg
746 ms
diffapp-copy-1024x797.jpg
745 ms
icon-phone.svg
784 ms
icon-facebook.svg
784 ms
icon-instagram.svg
783 ms
icon-youtube.svg
813 ms
icon-tiktok.svg
775 ms
icon-linkedin.svg
814 ms
instashow.js
16 ms
icon-hoplr.svg
771 ms
matomo.php
424 ms
differdange.lu accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
differdange.lu best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
differdange.lu SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
FR
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Differdange.lu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Differdange.lu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
differdange.lu
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Differdange. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: